Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (7706)	3/8/2004 5:15:15 PM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

I disagree - there is very little question that we would be just about exactly where we are in Iraq and internationally if Clinton were in the WH, Gore, Kerry or Lieberman. Before I finished that sentence, I asked myself would Clinton have pissed off Russia or France, and then answered myself "yes." Woould he have continued another 12 years of "no fly zone" enforcement after intelligence was given to him linking Saddam with terror? No way!! Saddam was open in his support of suicide bombers, open in his support for Jihad vs US. That would have been enough. He probably would have been a bit better in justifying it on the basis of human rights as opposed to WMD but I'm just speculating there. Same intelligence or lack thereof on many levels, same policies, same reaction to Saddam high stakes misinformation game, etc., etc., etc.