Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (20387)	3/8/2004 9:48:30 PM
From: laura_bush	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32871

Oh, really? How 'bout you provide a list of public figures whom you find "sacrosanct" that SI or other Internet sites should "ban" for "adoption." I find no "hillary clinton" aliases here, for example. Should such aliases be "BANNED," do you think? Out of humble "respect" for the politicians who are stealing us blind? -g "lb"

To: rrufff who wrote (20387)	3/8/2004 10:03:09 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32871

Hello rrufff, So should I be allowed to take the name "John Kerrry" and then go on to rant and rave like a lunatic? I see nothing to prevent you from doing so, as long as it is perfectly clear to everyone that you are engaging in a parody of the man rather than trying to convince everyone that you are indeed the real McCoy. However, I sense that you are not among Mr. Kerry's supporters, so I would remind you of this old adage. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Would your parody of Mr. Kerry truly be intended to flatter the candidate? KJC