Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (4805)	3/8/2004 10:56:40 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 90947

Hmmm. She raised those points a week ago. Dave did not care to get involved at that time. I posted to him that if he feels this thread is in violation of TOU or is otherwise offensive, he may delete it. I just repeated that to him. If he does so, I will not protest and ask that others do not either. I also fully agree with your point that BIA taking the name of the First Lady is offensive and was intentionally mean to be. What is interesting is that AS does NOT seem to find this thread offensive and in fact has posted many times on it. And is basically guaranteed the right to do so. I do ask that "laura" not be attacked on this thread since she is banned. (I'd say your post is at least in a gray area and quite possibly quite acceptable since she did bring up the subject of this thread first.) I frankly would rather have the thread deleted than unban her. She is the only banee at this point; there were two others but they were unbanned during last weeks discussions and notified that they were unbanned.