Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michelino who wrote (20400)	3/8/2004 11:52:52 PM
From: SI Dave	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32871

>>You need to unequivocally denounce the practice and remove the threads in question. Deleting the thread in its entirety was and remains open to consideration, if the system can even handle it with current constraints on the DB system. That said: Everyone can consider the practice of creating or using threads for primary purpose of "attacking other members" unequivocally denounced. If anyone believes a thread currently fits that purpose, you can submit it for review via Private Message to siliconinvestor.com at your convenience.

To: Michelino who wrote (20400)	3/8/2004 11:56:57 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32871

Where in the thread header are there any explicit or implicit promotions of personal attacks on fellow SI members? Subject 54350 Please show me the precise words that convinced you that personal attacks are encouraged. BTW, even if the thread header or any SI member encouraged personal attacks, wouldn't the TOU still be able to be properly enforced when a genuine personal attack took place? FWIW, if a thread did encourage personal attacks, I would support SI Admin in removing the thread. I just don't see it in that thread header.