Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (1568)	3/9/2004 9:59:46 AM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116555

Shell Games nytimes.com The new head of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group and its current chief financial officer, as well as the chairman ousted last week, were advised of huge shortfalls in proven oil and natural gas reserves in 2002, two years before they were publicly disclosed, according to company memorandums and notes of executive discussions. But rather than disclose the problems to investors, senior executives in a July 2002 memorandum came up with — and later carried out — what the memorandum described as an "external storyline" and "investor relations script" that tried to "highlight major projects fueling growth," "stress the strength" of existing resources, and minimize the significance of reserves as a measure of growth.

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (1568)	3/9/2004 10:08:24 AM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 116555

Royal Bank of Canada Jumps off the Deep End rbc.com RBC Economics debunks perception that North American household finances are in disarray. Myth No. 1: North American households are in over their heads in debt. Myth No. 2: Consumer bankruptcies keep getting worse. Myth No. 3: Growth in revolving credit products is a problem. Myth No. 4: Households will be in trouble when interest rates rise. Myth No. 5: Households are not saving enough. Myth No. 6: Households are frivolously spending their home equity. Myth No. 7: Falling equity prices hurt credit quality.

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (1568)	3/9/2004 10:21:43 AM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116555

Brian Reynolds on Treasuries We took a break from the conference we are attending this week to visit a friend's office yesterday. While we were there, we caught a glimpse of someone on TV saying that bond shorts were throwing in the towel, as the 10-year Treasury was on its way to adding another 5/8ths of a point to Friday's gains. The price action in Treasuries yesterday confirms our thoughts that, despite having a golden opportunity Friday to hedge themselves, a number of mortgage investors missed the boat and did not hedge enough. We have written a number of times in the past how a move to these levels would spur increased mortgage refinancings. What we need to watch out for over the next few weeks is for a move that feeds on itself; if more mortgage investors need to hedge themselves by buying Treasuries, then the resulting price action would spur more refinancings and force the rest of the mortgage community to hedge themselves. We can't say for sure if that will happen or to what extent; we've been involved in enough of them during our career to know that predicting the extent of moves like this is extremely difficult. What we can say to anyone involved in or looking at the Treasury market is that it is now in the hands of people who do not care about fundamental valuations, and for whom support and resistance mean nothing. All that matters to a mortgage investor now is to be hedged properly against potential swings in refinancings, so other investors in the Treasury space need to be careful. Also, corporate bond continue to put in a much better than expected performance given how much Treasuries have rallied. Investment-grade spreads were unchanged yesterday, and junk spreads only widened 1-2 basis points. So, almost the full impact of the Treasury rally has flowed through to corporates, which is unusual. That means that we remain in an environment where, since Friday, we are getting stimulus from both Treasury investors (through refis) and from corporate investors. We've noted that the only other time that has happened together in the last 5 years was last summer, which eventually resulted in significantly higher equity prices. We've also noted that, in the short run, we expect the equity correction to continue, as the S&P has had trouble putting in a new high. The bearish investors that we have talked to really seem to be focused on the lack of job growth. Just as was the case last summer, those investors seem to be focused on the lack of current job creation, and are ignoring the stimulus from refis and corporates. We wrote yesterday that we don't know whether the correction will last for a few days or a few weeks but, the longer that the benefits from refis and corporates persists, the greater the odds are that we will eventually see new highs in stocks.