Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (550113)	3/9/2004 6:27:02 PM
From: Srexley	Respond to of 769670

"You never answered my question about a guy getting a sex change operation" Because it was a stupid question. But I will humor you since you seem so desperate for my opinion on this. "Suppose a guy marries a lesbian, a legal marriage by your definition" This is a legal marriage by any definition in the United States. Is it not legal by your definition? I realize that you are a bigot, but I think you have to admit that it is legal by anyone's definition. Don't know why he would marry a lesbian, and vice versa, but ok by me if that is their desire. "then after the ceremony he undergoes a sex change operation" Eeeewww. That's his problem. I don't care if he does it or not. They are legal. OK with you? "What does that do to your scenario?" It doesn't do anything to my scenario. I am a heterosexual male married to a heterosexual female. Legal in the courts, and in line with societal tradition since the beginning of America. And I am an American. What does it do to your scenario? Happy now, bigot?