To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (4832 ) 3/9/2004 6:31:06 PM From: Original Mad Dog Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947 I missed the part where mph called you a "hypocrite" or even used the word. Did I miss a post somewhere in this exchange? I guess you believe, then, that the President who gave the following speech was an evil murderer:Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors. Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world. Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons. I want to explain why I have decided, with the unanimous recommendation of my national security team, to use force in Iraq; why we have acted now; and what we aim to accomplish. .... The international community had good reason to set this requirement. Other countries possess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them. Not once, but repeatedly. Unleashing chemical weapons against Iranian troops during a decade-long war. Not only against soldiers, but against civilians, firing Scud missiles at the citizens of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Iran. And not only against a foreign enemy, but even against his own people, gassing Kurdish civilians in Northern Iraq. The international community had little doubt then, and I have no doubt today, that left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again. I guess you disagree with directing bombs at Iraq based on those reasons. I guess you think it's "hubris", an "evil deed", based on "fabricated reasons", etc., to unleash a military attack on a country (Iraq) for those reasons.