SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (8090)3/11/2004 2:09:39 AM
From: Dale Baker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20773
 
OT - I have an idea to run past you. Please PM me or E-mail dabmu@yahoo.com.



To: epicure who wrote (8090)3/11/2004 5:06:23 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20773
 
Re: To their credit they said they don't have time to pursue crappy posting issues like this one. So it's probably just some SI crank, or our SI representatives aren't telling us the whole truth and nothing but the truth (and wouldn't THAT be a surprise...)

X, it just crosses my mind that... SI Adm Dave's (mis)conduct actually verged on sexist harassment!! Savvy? Now, I hate playing the ambulance chaser here BUT... next time he harasses you, sue him!! I'm sure you won't have problem subpoenaing witnesses <g>



To: epicure who wrote (8090)3/11/2004 8:04:02 AM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 20773
 
Or the Chron spokesperson could be lying or not know what the papers lawyers are doing. The possibility a SI crank is involved is very likely, perhaps one who lives or has lived in the SF area. Just speculation.



To: epicure who wrote (8090)3/11/2004 9:17:30 AM
From: SI Dave  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20773
 
All that will prove, if it really exists, is that the person you are purportedly corresponding with doesn't know that someone else at SFGate requested the removal of their copyrighted material.