SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (6438)3/11/2004 7:45:32 PM
From: PoetRespond to of 81568
 
Nice. :-)



To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (6438)3/11/2004 7:53:32 PM
From: tontoRespond to of 81568
 
Fair enough. All taxpayers should have a rate increase to balance the budget. Unfortunately, it is an election year, so it would be murder to a candidate to increase everyone's taxes...he would lose the job he is after. It is all about the job, not the people.

By that standard, not counting the SS surpluses and going by the Presidents latest budget, we're about $800 billion short of what would be fair taxation.



To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (6438)3/11/2004 8:17:42 PM
From: mphRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
you're begging the question and ignoring my point.

The "fair share" language is used to suggest
that people in higher brackets are somehow not
paying THEIR "fair share."

You're talking about a different issue.
But I suspect you know that.
As does Poet.



To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (6438)3/29/2004 5:54:09 PM
From: TimFRespond to of 81568
 
I think fair taxation would be taking in as much as you spend during an expansion.

So if the government spent another trillion dollars per year then it would be fair to increase taxes by something like a trillion and a half? If it spent twice as much then it would be fair to increase taxes by over two and a half trillion dollars?? Or for that matter would you consider it fair that everyone including the wealthy only pay .5% of their income in taxes as long as we slash government spending by enough that the budget is still balanced?

Defining a fair level of taxes by having the budget balanced doesn't seem to make a lot of sense.

Tim