Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (8186)	3/11/2004 10:42:59 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

No, I was always very suspicious of Bush's programs, and turns out all my suspicions were right. I am sad to say that BTW, I don;'t wish this country to fail on any level. 18 months ago I was on these threads stating that Saddam was a paper tiger and only a hyped up potential threat, so what's the rush? Still I supported disarming him because I trust our govern,ment not to be complete liars in incompetents. I was at an early JK fundraiser where someone asked him why he was voting for war authorization. He stated that he wanted to make sure Saddam was disarmed, wanted to do it the right way, would make sure Bush didn't rush in without the UN (or else criticize him) and finally that his inside intel told him GW was going to invade no matter what anyway so might as well make the best of it. Remember, Clinton went into Kosovo without UN authorization. It's not always a bad thing. In Iraq's case though it was just plain inept or dishonest, take your pick. Maybe both.