Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (125948)	3/12/2004 12:00:27 AM
From: Jacob Snyder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

When a prisoner dies in custody, the burden of proof is on his jailers, to prove he wasn't murdered. This is especially true, when those jailers have a pattern of killing prisoners in their custody, and never naming or punishing anyone for the crime. I'm sure, if a prisoner died while in the custody of the PLO, you wouldn't assume "natural causes", no matter what the PLO said. When prisoners in Stalin's Gulags died in custody, nobody believed it was "natural". But, with the U.S. and Israel (and nobody else), you are endlessly credulous. What Abbas did in 1985 was a crime. What my nation did to him, in 2004, is also a crime. The ironic thing is, if he'd stayed in Israel, he'd still be alive, because Israel had given him an amnesty.