SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (4398)3/12/2004 9:30:37 AM
From: Ed Huang  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 22250
 
I don't believe the "Al-Qaeda" story easily either. Base on the reports so far, it seems to me ETA is more likely than Al-Qaeda to be behind the attack.



To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (4398)3/22/2004 11:16:47 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22250
 
your prediction and opinion were 100% incorrect,but don`t let that stop you <PIMP>

>>Well, first, "Al-Qaeda" is a buzzword crafted by US intelligence... so, to claim that "Al-Qaeda" perpetrated 311 (the Madrid mass murder) is either meaningless or tantamount to claim that US/Israeli intelligence is behind it...

Now, even if some Arab/Islamic terrorist outfit were involved, it would have relied on ETA manpower anyway! For two reasons: first because ETA leaders empathize with Arab freedom fighters and oppose the Iraqi crusade:>>