Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (125962)	3/12/2004 11:47:46 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Hi Michael..Welcome back! Article in the Seattle PI today had a long article about her. You had to read at least 6-8 paragraphs to see that: She worked as a TEMPORARY for 13 weeks in 1987 at the Seattle PI.... (Another reason employers need to be careful of "try before you buy" temporaries....none of the paperwork follows them to the employer, but stays with the temp service.) The other thing that was interesting was one had to read to nearly the very end of the article to see what House and Senate Democrats she had worked for. Re: Card....article talked about him being a 'distant relative'...(2nd cousin)...later says she never saw him. I wonder how many of us know our 2nd cousins. ???? It is "interesting" to note that she worked a year or less for anyone of these people mentioned. It would be very wise to check out her complete resume, and check all the lapses and see where she really was during that time, and how she was funded. Don't believe that temporaries are paid very much, but then....maybe because they are government employees, maybe they are. Another thing that I'm sure will be checked out.