SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (126032)3/12/2004 6:13:31 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Hi Neocon; Re: "I am merely struck with the scurrilous irrelevancy of bringing up Holocaust denial ..."

My point in bringing it up was to point out the common failure in logic: Just because someone has no motive for doing something is not significant evidence that they didn't do it. As to why you bring up "scurrilous", my guess is that you use these kinds of words to describe anything that doesn't agree with your preconceived notions.

-- Carl



To: Neocon who wrote (126032)3/12/2004 7:47:13 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I am merely struck with the scurrilous irrelevancy of bringing up Holocaust denial as if it were somehow analogous to what Nadine was doing. I do not read her as denying the possibility, but of trying to assess probabilities with little to go on........

Just so. So the US has no motive to commit the crime, and there is no evidence that a crime was committed, but we-know-who will choose to believe in the crime anyway.

Whereas Hitler spent 20 years spelling out his motives and acting on them, and left behind a mountain of evidence (did you know that the German railways issued 11 million one-way tickets for the victims of the Holocaust?), but then again, there are those who claim there was no motive and no evidence, or not much, anyway. A few illegal executions, to be sure.

Facts are such inconvenient things, lets just ignore them.