SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: blue red who wrote (8275)3/13/2004 5:48:44 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20773
 
If those sentiments from foreign leaders were expressed to Kerry privately, as it appears they were, it would violate their confidence to identify them.

If they were actually made, (and it's hard to tell when since he hasn't been in a position to meet with foreign leaders in the past year), and if they were intended to be kept confidential, he had no business disclosing them at all. He's been in politics long enough to know that statements you make where you say "this happened but I refuse to give you any evidence" don't work in a democracy.

If that approach actually were acceptable in politics, then Bush saying "I know Saddam had WMD but I can't tell you now, just trust me" would be an unchallengeable statement.

But it's not when made by Bush, and it's not when made by Kerry.