Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : WAR on Terror. Will it engulf the Entire Middle East? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (6847)	3/13/2004 3:22:07 PM
From: steve kammerer	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 32591

Ruffy, haven't heard you make one comment about Sharon's latest attempt to annex more land. That's the problem and always has been. And you fail to object to the heavy handed actions of Sharon aside from some meek little statements like you don't alwase agree with him. Sounds like Rush Limbaugh's statements that he's not in Bush's camp because he sometimes doesn't agree with some small part of his policy. As long as you can find someone who you feel may have done something worse than your boy then your boy is ok. Cool logic. It's like arguing whether Sam is worse than John because Sam abused 28 little boys and John only abused 15! Example of your newest one:" You fail to object to heavy handed action by Syria. Do you approve of Syria's occupation of Lebanon? Do you think they got there by being kind and gentle?" Again Ruffy is trying to imply in a sleazy way that if Syria was heavy handed in Lebanon, then it's not so bad that Israel is fucking over Palestine. By the way, whose action caused the collapse of Lebanon? Who was in charge of the soldiers that wiped out the village there? Oh wow... our little war criminal Sharon. Your secret hero whom you claim not to worship.