Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (6919)	3/13/2004 1:40:02 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

but it won't change the fact that the bad aspect of this economy simply isn't the product of Bush's doings. Nonsense. The problem isn't the recession, it is the recovery, or as I like to call it, the "liquidity driven event" that Bush created to get re-elected. We have never, ever had a recovery that failed to create jobs with any other president. What is Bush's answer to the problem? I don't think he has an answer. And he hired a loser economic team, who even the Washington Post says are incapable of coming up with creative solutions to the problem.

To: Dan B. who wrote (6919)	3/13/2004 3:52:11 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

The Nasdaq fell more in anticipation of Bush's economic policies which are strictly pro big corporate polluters and gougers of consumers as opposed to "new Economy". Bush has never been interested in high-tech. In fact when his people attacked California wih their phony energy crisis, they cocnentrated on Silicon Valley. Bush's 9 month war effort also knocked the market to its knees and cost millions of jobs. There is plenty of blame to go around for Bushies. They deserve to be held fully accountable for making some of the worst mis-steps in history, some of them deliberate to reward special interests and grab mre political power.