Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (126122)	3/13/2004 3:07:21 PM
From: Sig	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

<<<Considering the years that the UN had to change this program (and obviously didn't have the guts to do so), then it is beyond me how anyone can expect the UN to act in a speedy manner, much less with any hope of actually stopping the murdering terrorists. >>> Several reasons come to mind as to why the UN should be modified to handle the job. The same diplomats and officials would be involved in the decision process. They are organized, funded and have a familiar meeting place and know the routine. What is required is an active enforcement arm. If that happens some parties with guilty conscience may resign from the UN. Good riddance. Also I sense that various countries military, special forces, or intelligence agencies would get into the planning or the act. Discuss what each may be able to accomplish. This would contaminate the UN position as a peace keeping group. Its a nasty job but somebody should do it. And soon, before Spain decides to bombing Morocco. BWDIK? Sig