SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert who wrote (59510)3/13/2004 8:05:15 PM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
Plus, corporations get to "live" forever, so have longer to make it back.

Charles Tutt (SM)



To: Robert who wrote (59510)3/13/2004 8:56:10 PM
From: rkral  Respond to of 64865
 
OT .. Robert, my reasoning for no corporate taxes is naive and simplistic, I'm sure, but here it is.

First, with only corporate taxes or only individual taxes, the possibility of double taxation is considerably reduced, perhaps even eliminated. It's just got to be a lot simpler to administer a tax program .. equitably .. when there's no possibility of double taxation. For me, that's one of the goals. (Of course, there's still double taxation via sales tax, once at the income stage and again at the expenditure stage.)

If corporations pay all the taxes, then the cost of products is increased for everyone, the rich and the poor alike.

If corporations pay *no* taxes, the cost of products is reduced, and dividends and capital gains are increased. Product cost is reduced for all, but the important point is the cost is reduced for the poor. Dividends and capital gains are generally income to the rich, not the poor. So the result, I think, would be the rich would always pay more taxes than the poor, which is the way it should be, IMHO.

Preferential tax treatment for dividends and capital gains would need to be eliminated too, I guess, as part of the above.

Regards, Ron