SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: NOW who wrote (1964)3/13/2004 9:10:05 PM
From: Mike McFarland  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
<the consumer is EVERYTHING to the economy>

Then things will get pretty lousy because consumers
are broke.

Here is one of those posts where I type whatever
pops into my head, let me know if you find
anything that makes sense <g>.

However...once you've spent your home equity loan,
and been refused that third car loan, and the credit
card offers start to dry up, then you finally have
to live within your means. Hey, finally the trade
deficit comes down.

Maybe the consumer is the worst part of the economy,
at least the consumer that sends his dollars straight
overseas. The dollar you earn should really circulate
a few times at home, paid to the mechanic who fixes
your older car, who spends it on the guy who
fixes his back etc. And those dollars get taxed
a few times more than the money we send to Samsung
and Sony, right?

<wage losses> Yes, right, and that has already
started and it will be a long term trend.

In post 1931 I said the jobs of the future will
be biotech, software, healthcare, education.
And I should have added that will pay less.
I think a lot of people are going to learn
how to be frugal--the way my grandparents were
frugal.

Here is something that I found interesting...
Buying a first home remains extremely difficult for
those under 120 percent of median household income, making
less than $78,500 in 2002. The median price for a single
family home or condominium was $256,000 in 2002.

metrokc.gov

See, this is the sort of think I do not understand.
A house is about three times your income? To me, that
actually makes incomes sound pretty high. Maybe I am
totally wrong about the real estate boom, the average
house is only about three times the average household
income. I wonder what that multiple was fifty years ago.
I'll bet it was a bit higher, I think people now buy
a lot of stuff that pretty much pisses their wealth
away, what is that called, disposable income, on
"non-durable" consumer electronics, gadgets, high
speed internet, extra cars, pressure washers to wash
your extra cars etc etc. Ah, I remember something
that was thrown around for awhile--"affluenza".