SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (34322)3/14/2004 3:01:15 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793914
 
Military News - COMBAT SUPPORT: Marines Cobble Together CONDOR

March 13, 2004: The U.S. Marine Corps is building its own battlefield Internet. When the marines went to war in Iraq in 2003 they quickly discovered that their radio equipment was not up to the needs of fast moving mechanized warfare. That's understandable, as Iraq was the first time the marines ever had to advance so quickly, and so far inland, during combat.

Taking this as the wave of the future, and lacking the money for a lot of expensive new communications gear, the marines came up with CONDOR (Command and Control on the Move Network, Digital Over the Horizon Relay). Basically, CONDOR equips each marine battalion with satellite telephone and encrypted wi-fi gear, as well as networking hardware for all sorts of marine radios. The satellite link means that no battalion is ever out of range of radio or Internet communication. Most marine radios are "line of sight" (FM) and are of limited range. When units spread out too far, they lose radio contact unless they have satellite phones. The marines got satellite phones and satellite based communications gear from the army during the Iraq campaign. This proved a lifesaver.

CONDOR goes one step further by establishing wi-fi nodes throughout the battalion area, and also collects and transmits data from the EPLRS (locator transmitters) that every vehicle carries. The problem with EPLRS was that it used a line of sight signal (unlike the army Blue Force Tracker, which used satellite communications). CONDOR transmits EPLRS data to all marine units in the area, thus allowing a division commander to see where all his vehicles and troops are, even if they are hundreds of kilometers apart. CONDOR also allows any radio in the battalion to use the satellite link to call anywhere in the worldwide marine communications network.

CONDOR will also provide Internet connections for everyone in the battalion. The Internet has become a necessary tool for combat operations, especially the Department of Defense secure Internet (which is encrypted and not connected to the public Internet). Logistics, intelligence and personnel work is done over the military Internet, and CONDOR will insure that marines are never out of touch. CONDOR can also use any satellite system that is available.

Since the 1990s, this distance and communications problem has been foreseen, and a new family of radios (JTRS) were developed to deal with it. But JTRS won't be available until the end of the decade. So CONDOR will fill in until JTRS arrives. CONDOR is another example of how new technology is being developed so quickly that the usual Department of Defense way of developing new gear is often overtaken by faster evolving civilian equipment. No one expected satellite phones and wi-fi to come to market as quickly as they did. But here they are, and they will fill in until the official solution, JTRS, catches up.

March 11, 2004: In Iraq and Afghanistan, American troops are increasingly using their most powerful weapon, flexible training. The U.S. armed forces learned a valuable lesson sixty years ago, during World War II; that training for combat has to change constantly because during a major war the weapons and tactics used by both sides will change. Even before American combat troops went on the offensive in mid-1942, reports of how Allied soldiers were doing on the battlefield were being studied for ways to change American training. Not everyone agreed that training methods and subjects should constantly change, but by 1944, everyone was a believer. In every war since, it was a given that some of the first U.S. troops who saw combat, should be shipped back to the training centers to help adapt the training to whatever new conditions there were on the current battlefields.

This approach to combat training has intensified during the current operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. For one thing, there are now teams of historians and researchers out there with the troops, reporting back to training bases in the U.S. This information is used to modify current training methods, and develop new ones. Thus soon after combat occurred in Afghanistan and Iraq, training back in the United States was being modified. Not just training, but also tactics and all manner of techniques used by units supporting the combat troops. It was recognized as far back as World War II that if you adapted to new conditions faster than the enemy, you had a major advantage. In Afghanistan, al Qaeda and Taliban adapted to American weapons and tactics they had never encountered before (like smart bombs), and after a few months these weapons were not as effective as they first were. But American troops were adapting as well. The "adaptation race" continues in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In addition, trainers in the United States stay in email contact with many of the men and women they trained, and get feedback about which training methods or subjects need modification. This makes it possible to improve training methods even more quickly. If you are fast enough in making the changes, troops arriving in the combat zone won't as much additional training to bring them up to date on the latest wrinkles. This has been a problem since World War II, where some of the sharper division commanders set up special "combat refresher courses" for newly arrived replacements. Even though there was no email back then, or much intercontinental telephone service, information on what new tricks the enemy was up to could have been sent back to training bases daily. This wasn't done because no one in a position of authority realized how important it was and made it happen. Some division commanders, being closer to the action, did realize the need for acting faster on retraining the troops for what the enemy was doing recently. But once the troops in combat got access to email, another Iraqi war first, the training units in the States and the troops at the front realized how mutually useful it would be to communicate.

In Iraq, the frequent adjustments have to do with new attack methods used by hostile Iraqis, especially with roadside bombs. Troops in Iraq will use digital cameras to photograph new roadside bomb designs, describe them, and then email text and photos back to the trainers. Troops a few weeks away from arriving in Iraq can then be shown the latest road side bomb designs, the better to spot and avoid them. This approach went a long way towards dealing with the "newbie disease." New troops arriving in Iraq did not have to learn so many new things, as their up-to-date training had prepared them well.

The increased speed in noting, recording and acting on new enemy methods can backfire if you are not careful in guarding the information. Most of this information, like how roadside bombs are designed, is of little interest to the media or general public, but the Iraqi guerillas would love to be on the distribution list. It seems that the dozen or so Iraqi resistance groups do not communicate that often with each other. American troops have a better idea of all the bomb making and ambush tactics used by all the Iraqi resistance groups than any one Iraqi group does. So this collected information has to be handled carefully lest it serve to make the isolated Iraqi resistance groups more lethal.

Most people outside the military don't realize how important, or lethal, training is. But for thousands of years it has been one very real secret weapon.