To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (909 ) 3/14/2004 1:38:23 PM From: Lizzie Tudor Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1017 California: What are Bush's prospects in the state? Zip, zero, nada: No way after 24/7 war he and his oil cronies waged on us Since then, things in the case of Bush v. California have only gotten worse. The whole relationship got off on the wrong foot when, just days before his inauguration, Bush mouthed off to a national television audience, saying the energy problems California was experiencing were the state's own fault and there was nothing he could do to help. President Clinton tended the Golden State like a prized vineyard, spending more time here than any president except Ronald Reagan - who, of course, actually lived in the state. It took Bush four months into his presidency before he journeyed to California, and his subsequent trips have been few and far between - mostly quick fundraising jaunts, like the one earlier this month. In fact, it's a standing joke among Democrats that Bush thinks California is a foreign country because of the word "republic" on our state flag. (You know how he is with geography.)On that first trip to California as president in May of 2001, former oilman Bush wagged his finger and warned us of the evils of energy price controls - even while his cronies and campaign bankrollers at Enron and other Texas-based energy companies were, as we now know, robbing us blind. Since then, the catalog of Bush administration transgressions against California is thick -and growing fatter by the day. We still have extracted only a pittance in refunds - courtesy of the industry-friendly, Bush-controlled Federal Energy Regulatory Commission - from those piratical energy companies that manipulated electricity prices and made a killing off of us.On the environment particularly, Bush has battered California from all sides. The president's Justice Department sided with big oil companies in going to court to deny the state the right to stop new offshore drilling in federal waters if it poses a threat to the environment. The administration also ganged up with the big auto manufacturers to sue California over our innovative zero-emissions-vehicles policy. In fact, Atty. Gen. Bill Lockyer has publicly complained that his office is spending so many millions defending the state against Bush's legal predations that it is diverting money from fighting pollution. (This is the same Bush who's against frivolous lawsuits - unless, I guess, his own administration is filing them.) What's more, Bush has proposed opening up the old-growth groves in the Giant Sequoia National Monument to logging - and that right after he made a much-publicized visit to the Sequoia National Park to stare at one of the ancient trees.He has advocated allowing oil-and-gas exploration in the fragile Los Padres National Forest. He's moved to exempt from federal clean-water laws the state's seasonal ponds used by migratory birds. His pal over at the Defense Department, Donald Rumsfeld, wants to declare military bases safe harbors from the state's strict environmental laws. Bush himself badmouthed California's adoption in 2002 of the nation's first law banning the gases that contribute to global warming. And the sins go on. Bush's trigger-happy attorney general, John Ashcroft, last year threatened to slap criminal charges on the state's chief firearms-control official if California continued to use a federal databank to hunt down those who are barred from owning guns.sacbee.com