SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dan B. who wrote (7203)3/14/2004 2:11:17 PM
From: ChinuSFORead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
If you are considering electing our President based on his looks, then you are downright stupid. Mr Crechtian, the former Canadian PM had a facial disability. But the Canadians are smart to look past that into the qualities of the person. So I would hope you would abandon your stupid approach.

Now onto the real thing. Do you think Bush is nervous. Do you think that by going on a negative attack as an incumbent reinforces his image that he is a polarizer? Many people tink he is not Presidential the way he is campaigning. Here is some reading.

...contd. from msnbc.msn.com

In contrast to those previous runs for office, Bush's reelection campaign has been notable for its quick plunge into attacks on his Democratic rival, Sen. John F. Kerry (Mass.), its defensive tone and the absence of a tight agenda of policy proposals that would animate a second term in office. His first positive ads were modest in describing Bush's accomplishments, and his first negative ad, which began airing Friday, surfaced far earlier than anyone outside his campaign expected.

The new tone threatens to rob Bush of his assets from successful past campaigns, according to some strategists. Most prominent is the easygoing personality that helped soften his image and attract swing voters who did not always agree with some of his conservative views; but his three years as president have left the country more polarized in their perceptions of Bush as a leader.



To: Dan B. who wrote (7203)3/14/2004 5:02:02 PM
From: Rock_njRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
Of course, there are all sorts of regrssive policies engineered by Bush, from higher energy prices to higher deficits, to a massive tax cut for the rich. All designed to help all his wealthy cronies. Isn't America great! George W. Bush is the best thing to ever happen to the wealthy in America. I mean he's taken all the favors ever granted by Nixon/Reagan and his father and accelerated them massively. If you're in the top 5%, vote for Bush. It's in your interest to do so. He's your man. If you're the rest of 95% of working America, you need to vote against Bush like your life depened upon it, because it might.

Bush and his Republican cronies have an overarching plan to bring America back to the 19th Century where robber barrons and the wealthy elites ruled everyone else ruthlessly, where working and living conditions were horrendous. If you don't benefit from Bush's plan, don't vote for it.



To: Dan B. who wrote (7203)3/14/2004 6:44:36 PM
From: American SpiritRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
The energy prices started up as Bush was being nominated and picking Cheney, then continued until the day after Jeffords switched parties. Bush-cheney used the energy gougings in many ways during the campaign. Their campaign made a lot of $$ off it too as the thieves funneled a ton of cash into the campaign and extra-curricular soft money efforts. Ed Gillespie was in charge of covering it all up.