Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (34535)	3/15/2004 9:51:18 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793868

It wasn't. Back packs or satchels containing explosives wired to cell phones. Then all detonated at the same time. I have no doubt it was Muslim terrorists. How do you get from remote detonation to Muslim terrorists? I would think that fact would lead in the opposite direction.

To: LindyBill who wrote (34535)	3/15/2004 9:56:39 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793868

Bill, With all due respects there are too many "no doubts" in conservative speak these days. I agree about the probability of an al qaeda connection although not that this was their op. Socialists won big and that was quite a surprise. In the US cons need to understand the opposition a little better and not be so dismissive. What the spanish people did was quite predictable. They were against the war and feel that they were attacked because of that involvement and that the ruling party tried a coverup. This is a lesson for bush in the value of truth telling. For instance all the double speak in the world about wmds doesnt minimize david kayes advice to this admin to fess up not about hyping wmds just admitting that the intel "may" or "so far" has been wrong. Fessing up is better than double speak. Mike