SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (126318)3/15/2004 10:28:42 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 281500
 
If Saddam had said that he was invading Kuwait for the purpose that he believed that Kuwait was hiding WMDs, you would have opposed him, correct? Would you oppose Syria if it invaded Israel for the same reason?

Iraq and Syria have a credibility problem with me. So I would disregard their stated rationale for invasion.



To: Bilow who wrote (126318)3/16/2004 6:03:02 AM
From: greenspirit  Respond to of 281500
 
The problem with you question is it neglects to take into consideration the special role America has in keeping the peace and promoting democracy, prosperity and freedom around the world.

Equating Iraq, Kawaiit or Syria with the United States is ludicrous.



To: Bilow who wrote (126318)3/16/2004 6:06:35 AM
From: Bill Ulrich  Respond to of 281500
 
Carl, them questions kinda rely upon whose ox is in the hoosegow, don't they? Possession is some tenths of the law, and intent is another some tenths.

"If Saddam had said that he was invading Kuwait for the purpose that he believed that Kuwait was hiding WMDs, you would have opposed him, correct? Would you oppose Syria if it invaded Israel for the same reason?"


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News