Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (7565)	3/15/2004 11:47:46 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

so where is the evidence that he can get bipartisan action within the Senate? Can you claim Bush has. he is the greatest polarizer. So why look at Kerry's record in isolation? here is man ready to exert dymanic bipartisan leadership with innovative programs to get the country moving in a new direction? If so, show me. I, frankly, didn't find it. Again it is Bush's performance that we Americans are interested in. Not Kerry's. It is Bush who wants to get re elected. besides, Bush did not have much of a record coming in. The American voter knew that and did not vote for him. It is the 5 Supreme court justices who put him there. There are lots more resolutions, none of them of any signifcance to the country as far as I could tell, though I admit I timed out at one point. Again Bush does not have anything to show for what he did on the economic front. What he did to prevent outsourcing etc. etc. Lastly, I said he has more experience than Bush at this point in his career. Experience in the battlefield and a distinguished one, knows about the military from first hand experience than does Bush, Lt. Gov. prosecutor, a Senator. A soldier, executive experience (Lt. Gov.), legislative experience (Senator), experienced in laws of the land etc. What did Bush have. If you voted for him then, if you find Bush to be OK according to the standards you applied then, why would you change that standard now?