SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pam who wrote (25367)3/16/2004 10:46:03 AM
From: pompsander  Read Replies (8) | Respond to of 60323
 
Has anyone on the thread seen a useful SNDK/LEXR comparison of product mix, market share, etc.? Being somewhat new to NAND, I would love to be able to see that.



To: Pam who wrote (25367)3/16/2004 12:24:18 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Respond to of 60323
 
Pam, Fab 1 was an existing Toshiba facility that was used for production while the equipment was being shipped from the Manassas, Viriginia plant to a new facility (Fab 2), which is currently in operation. If I recall correctly, Toshiba and SanDisk have a joint sharing operation from all their facilities. They share production on a 50-50 basis. The same arrangement goes for Fab 3, once it gets built.

Art



To: Pam who wrote (25367)3/16/2004 5:16:03 PM
From: Ausdauer  Respond to of 60323
 
Pam,

SanDisk was fabless for a while. Had they remained fabless they probably would
have not done so well the last year or two. The fact of the matter is that
current market conditions favor SNDK's current business model. Future success
depends on market demand and Samsung's production capabilities. I am personally
less concerned about newer NAND producers.

To some extent SNDK has tried to minimize capital investment in fabs since
leaving UMC and its NOR facilities several years ago. In that respect
the production agreements with Toshiba are somewhat of a hybrid source. Not
truly fabless and not truly non-captive.

Aus