Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (5453)	3/16/2004 4:16:57 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

Kerry would indeed do some of the same things GW is doing with regard to national security, which is why it's so absurd Bushies are trying to paint him as weak on defense. JK would also stick up for soldiers and vets more, instead of huge defense contracts for cronies which was GW's first priority as he entered office. Remember SDI? One thing JK wouldn't do however is needlessly rush into a massive expensive war without thorough preparations and a real coalition, unless it were a REAL imminent threat of course. JK would also not dis-engage in Israel and North Korea and would put a big emphasis on diplomacy. Powell does a pretyty good job but the neocons undercut him in so many ways. JK would also not hype and fabricate the way the neocons have in Iraq and Libya.