SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (7794)3/16/2004 6:14:19 PM
From: BearcatbobRead Replies (4) | Respond to of 81568
 
As - that statement is a bald faced falsehood. Again as always - you are dishonest or stupid. I am beginning to believe both apply.



To: American Spirit who wrote (7794)3/16/2004 6:17:19 PM
From: tontoRespond to of 81568
 
AS, give it up. You are being dishonest...again.
Care to explain how the recession...(s)

Bush inherited the best economy ever, pal.
Don't try to revise history.



To: American Spirit who wrote (7794)3/16/2004 6:30:10 PM
From: Dan B.Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
Re: "Bush inherited the best economy ever, pal."

That is factually ludicrous. The Nasdaq fall certainly could never have amounted to just a bump in the road. It had behind it the downward impetus we sentient beings all felt before Bush ever took office. This isn't a canoe, this is a battleship, and it takes time to turn it. The recession which began, as you note later here, in March of 2001, just 2 months into Bush Administration and prior to any Bush actions being put in place let alone working their way through the economy so that we'd notice, simply could not have resulted from Bush's actions. All that happened was that what was ALREADY BEEN HAPPENING under Clintons watch, kept going for 2 more months under Bush (after about 10 months of same under Clinton), and presto chango an official recession was born. Get real, or keep us LOL'ing, your choice.

Dan B.