Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (185004)	3/17/2004 3:05:51 PM
From: TigerPaw	Respond to of 1576891

but I'm pretty sure the Bush administration has all the bases covered. If so they wouldn't have the fiasco in Iraq, and Bin Laden on the loose. Pushing back the Taliban is the nearest thing to a sucess, and that is conditional on finishing. TP

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (185004)	3/17/2004 3:27:45 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576891

TP, Instead there was confusion and a one answer fits all solution which worked against a nation state, but failed against the criminal element. It's no surprise you see it this way, but I'm pretty sure the Bush administration has all the bases covered. Use the broadsword of the military to break up the regimes that harbor or support terrorism, and use the scalpel of law enforcement, intelligence, and special forces to round up the suspects in hiding. Do you really believe that Bush has all the bases covered? ted