SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Win Smith who wrote (6560)3/17/2004 3:49:50 PM
From: James Calladine  Respond to of 173976
 
Military Families Urge Censure for Bush as Congress Marks Iraq Anniversary

Coalition Critical of White House Deceptions
Delivers 560,340 Petition Signatures to House Offices
As Members Debate Resolution on the War


Win Without War Announces New Phase of Censure Campaign

WASHINGTON, March 17 /PRNewswire/ -- Families of soldiers serving, as well
as of those who have been casualties, in the occupation of Iraq came to
Capitol Hill today with other volunteers, urging Congress to censure President
George W. Bush.
Meanwhile, volunteers carried petitions that filled 18 large boxes, signed
so far by 560,340 members of MoveOn.org from every congressional district, to
each office in the House of Representatives, reinforcing the demand for a
censure resolution. The groups also displayed print and TV ads that will
begin running this week.
"My son, Army Lt. Seth Dvorin, who died last month while serving in Iraq,
met his responsibility to the nation he loved," said Sue Niederer of
Pennington, NJ. "As his mother, I am joining hundreds of thousands of
Americans today in asking that the Congress of the United States meet its
responsibility, as well."
Tom Andrews, national director of Win Without War, said the combined
activities represent an escalation of efforts that will continue. "The truth
matters. By not holding the President accountable, the Congress is saying it
doesn't. This is unacceptable," said Andrews, a former congressman and member
of the Armed Services Committee.
"The resolution now before Congress is silent on the many ways Bush
betrayed our trust, misleading us to make the case for this war," said Peter
Schurman, executive director of MoveOn.org, an Internet issues organization
with more than two million members.
Also participating in the news conference were Joseph Cirincione, director
of non-proliferation studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace; Richard Torgerson, a principal with Progressive Asset Management in
Maryland and a leader of Business Leaders for Sensible Priorities, and several
military families.
The ongoing campaign for censure of the President is led by Win Without
War, a national coalition of 42 membership organizations, and MoveOn.org, True
Majority, Working Assets and Business Leaders for Sensible Priorities.
Richard Torgerson, a financial services executive in Maryland, represented
Business Leaders and unveiled their new print ad, which will run this week in
The New York Times.
Cirincione is an author of the Carnegie Endowment's critical study on the
Bush Administration's distortion of intelligence and other evidence leading up
to the war. Entitled "WMD in Iraq: Evidence and Implications," it found that
Iraq's chemical and nuclear weapons programs "did not pose an immediate threat
to the United States," or to regional or global security. It also said "there
was and is no solid evidence of a cooperative relationship between Saddam's
government and Al Qaeda."
"The President and the Administration systematically misrepresented the
threat from Iraq," Cirincione said. "President Bush didn't have the facts, so
he made them up."
"We are honored to be joined in our nationwide campaign for accountability
by a growing number of families whose sons and daughters have served or are
serving our nation in uniform," Andrews said. Mildred Mortillo, whose son is
serving in Iraq, accompanied Ms. Niederer.
Speaking for herself and other military families, Ms. Niederer said: "Our
message to Congress today is clear: spare us the platitudes, the pious
rhetoric, the empty slogans. Give us the truth. Do your job and hold those
accountable who have denied us the truth. Censure President Bush for the
deceptions and manipulations that led our nation to war. You owe the American
people, my son and all those patriots who have sacrificed for their nation no
less."

SOURCE MoveOn.org; Win Without War
Web Site: moveon.org



To: Win Smith who wrote (6560)3/17/2004 3:50:18 PM
From: Win Smith  Respond to of 173976
 
Office of Special Plans disinfopedia.org

[ Googling Kwiatkowski turned up this nice little summary piece from a wikipedia offshoot. The original has a good set of links at the end. ]

(renamed in July 2003 to Northern Gulf Affairs Office)

The Office of Special Plans (OSP) was created by Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld to help create a case to invade Iraq. OSP evolved from the Northern Gulf Affairs Office, which fell under the Pentagon's Near East and South Asia policy office. It was renamed and expanded to the Office of Special Plans in October 2002 to to handle prewar and postwar planning. The name change was done to 'mask' its true mission." [1].

Also see the RightWeb profile of the "Office of Special Plans". (Last update 2/11/04).
"Despite extensive planning by the U.S. Department of State's Future of Iraq Project to deal with post-Saddam chaos, much of which (including museum looting and extensive water and power shortages) was fully anticipated and provided for in those plans, these plans were simply set aside by Rumsfeld. [2].

"Air Force Lt. Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski, who worked in the Pentagon until her retirement, was with the Office of Special Plans: 'What I saw was aberrant, pervasive and contrary to good order and discipline,' Kwiatkowski wrote recently. 'If one is seeking the answers to why peculiar bits of 'intelligence' found sanctity in a presidential speech, or why the post-Saddam occupation has been distinguished by confusion and false steps, one need look no further than the process inside the Office of the Secretary of Defense.' She described the activities of Rumsfeld's Office of Special Plans as, 'A subversion of constitutional limits on executive power and a co-optation through deceit of a large segment of the Congress.' [3].

In July 2003, "due to ever increasing criticism about the role OSP has played in the gathering of intelligence and the conclusions made to justify the war with Iraq, the Pentagon changed the name of OSP back to its original name, Northern Gulf Affairs Office." [4].

Julian Borger, in his July 17, 2003 article "The spies who pushed for war," published by the Guardian/UK, writes that Democratic congressman David Obey said concerning the OSP: "'The office was charged with collecting, vetting and disseminating intelligence completely outside of the normal intelligence apparatus. In fact, it appears that information collected by this office was in some instances not even shared with established intelligence agencies and in numerous instances was passed on to the National Security Council and the president without having been vetted with anyone other than political appointees'." [5]

On March 9, 2004, Los Angeles Times' staff reporter Greg Miller writes that during testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, George J. Tenet, Director of the CIA, revealed that "A special intelligence unit at the Pentagon provided private prewar briefings to senior White House officials on alleged ties between Iraq and Al Qaeda without the knowledge of [the] CIA Director ... [and the] disclosure suggests that a controversial Pentagon office played a greater role than previously understood in shaping the administration's views on Iraq's alleged ties to the terrorist network behind the Sept. 11 attacks, and that it bypassed usual channels to make a case that conflicted with the conclusions of CIA analysts." [6]

In her 4-page article "The New Pentagon Papers" published March 10, 2004, by Salon, Karen Kwiatkowski, "reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war." [7]
Robert Dreyfuss and Jason Vest, in their January 26, 2004, Mother Jones article "The Lie Factory", write:

"As the momentum for war [in Iraq] began to build in early 2002, Paul D. Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith beefed up the intelligence unit and created an Iraq war-planning unit in the Pentagon's Near East and South Asia Affairs section, run by Deputy Undersecretary of Defense William Luti, under the rubric Office of Special Plans, or OSP; the new unit's director was Abram N. Shulsky. By then, David Wurmser had moved on to a post as senior adviser to Undersecretary of State John Bolton, yet another neocon, who was in charge of the State Department's disarmament, proliferation, and WMD office and was promoting the Iraq war strategy there. Shulsky's OSP, which incorporated the secret intelligence unit, took control, banishing veteran experts-including Joseph McMillan, James Russell, Larry Hanauer, and Marybeth McDevitt-who, despite years of service to NESA, either were shuffled off to other positions or retired. For the next year, Luti and Shulsky not only would oversee war plans but would act aggressively to shape the intelligence product received by the White House."

"According to Lt. Colonel Kwiatkowski, Luti and Shulsky ran NESA and the Office of Special Plans with brutal efficiency, purging people they disagreed with and enforcing the party line. 'It was organized like a machine,' she says. 'The people working on the neocon agenda had a narrow, well-defined political agenda. They had a sense of mission.' At NESA, Shulsky, she says, began 'hot-desking,' or taking an office wherever he could find one, working with Feith and Luti, before formally taking the reins of the newly created OSP. Together, she says, Luti and Shulsky turned cherry-picked pieces of uncorroborated, anti-Iraq intelligence into talking points, on issues like Iraq's WMD and its links to Al Qaeda. Shulsky constantly updated these papers, drawing on the intelligence unit, and circulated them to Pentagon officials, including Rumsfeld, and to Vice President Cheney. 'Of course, we never thought they'd go directly to the White House,' she adds."

"Kwiatkowski recalls one meeting in which Luti, pressed to finish a report, told the staff, "I've got to get this over to 'Scooter' right away." She later found out that "Scooter" was none other than I. Lewis Scooter Libby, Vice President Cheney's chief of staff. According to Kwiatkowski, Cheney had direct ties through Luti into NESA/OSP, a connection that was highly unorthodox.

"'Never, ever, ever would a deputy undersecretary of Defense work directly on a project for the vice president,' she says. 't was a little clue that we had an informal network into Vice President Cheney's office.'

"Although Feith insists that the OSP did not seek to gather its own intelligence, Kwiatkowski and others sharply disagree. Staff working for Luti and Shulsky in NESA/OSP churned out propaganda-style intelligence, she says. As an example, she cited the work of a U.S. intelligence officer and Arabic specialist, Navy Lt. Commander Youssef Aboul-Enein, who was a special assistant to Luti. 'His job was to peruse the Arabic-language media to find articles that would incriminate Saddam Hussein about terrorism, and he translated these.' Such raw intelligence is usually subject to a thorough vetting process, tracked, verified, and checked by intelligence professionals. But not at OSP-the material that it produced found its way directly into speeches by Bush, Cheney, and other officials."

See remainder of article for more details on the Bush administration/OSP connections and activities.



To: Win Smith who wrote (6560)3/19/2004 10:40:24 AM
From: PartyTime  Respond to of 173976
 
GOPWINGER DIRTY TRICKS:

salon.com
startribune.com
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
chronicle.com.
salon.com
americanprogress.org
villagevoice.com
truthout.org
commondreams.org
nytimes.com
realcities.com
billmon.org
realcities.com
prospect.org
slate.msn.com
interventionmag.com
antiwar.com
mediainfo.com
scoop.co.nz
usatoday.com
guardian.co.uk
mediainfo.com.