Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (185059)	4/2/2004 8:25:04 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573841

Tim, what do you want? 1 of 4 things, you choose 1 - You actually support the original statement that "Bush said, in effect, there absolutely - positively - as God is my witness ARE WEAPONS in Iraq and he is going to use them to blow up American cities within the next few months." It doesn't have to be exact. If Cheney, or Rice, or Powell, or Rumsfeld said that Iraqi WMD where going to be used to blow up American cities in a matter of months, that would be close enough. If Bush said that Iraqi WMD where going to be used to blow up American cities "very soon", or "within a year", or "in the near future" that would be close enough. If any of the people I listed said that they had certain knowledge of a planned Iraqi WMD attack against US cities at any time that would be close enough. 2 - You acknowledge that the original statement was false. You could do this as part of a post that argues other bad things about Bush are true, or even specifically that Bush exaggerated or overestimated the WMD threat, as long as it is understood that the particular over the top statement Tigerpaw made was not true. 3 - That you at least concede that you have found no solid support for Tigerpaw's original statement. 4 - That you just stop talking about it. At this point I'm tempted to just go for number 4 anyway. I think this has gone on long enough for such a simple point. Tim