Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (35210)	3/17/2004 9:39:04 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793670

He is part of the Senate that insists on cramming 50 separate issues into one bill. It's a terrible practice. Terrible for transparency, terrible for accountability, terrible for ensuring a never ending spiral of increased spending and intrusions into the country's life. He's part of the problem so if he gets hurt because of it, too damn bad. He didn't cast his vote against body armor but against the conditions of the aid package that was part of the same bill. But he's still getting clobbered for voting against body armor because that's the net effect of his action so that's how it's being perceived. No one cares what his intentions were.