Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (126469)	3/18/2004 12:47:06 AM
From: smolejv@gmx.net	Respond to of 281500

Morocco franchise of AlQaeda. With the additional learning period spanning the two 11 milestones.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (126469)	3/18/2004 11:19:12 AM
From: ManyMoose	Respond to of 281500

Explosives of that genre are bulky. Whomever it was made use of the materials of opportunity, so it doesn't prove that Al Qaeda did not do the deed.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (126469)	3/18/2004 11:33:01 AM
From: boris_a	Respond to of 281500

This attack was different from both previous ETA AND previous Al Qaeda attacks. ... So what does this prove? Spains NeoCon government said it proves ETA being the bomber "without any doubt". But it's history now. Let's Move On.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (126469)	3/19/2004 7:33:02 AM
From: NightOwl	Respond to of 281500

Nadine...? I trust you noted the news on Wednesday/Thursday referencing the death of the suspected bomber of the hotel in Baghdad? It appears to have been "involuntary." I think you are correct there is a material difference in the recent attack in Spain, as well as the "new" response to such acts in Iraq. My guess is that Europe, unfortunately, will have a problem of escalating terrorist acts having nothing whatever to do with our handling of Afghanistan and Iraq. 0\|0