Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (35416)	3/18/2004 7:09:33 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793670

That's BS revisionist history! Is not. Don't your remember those polls where large majorities of voters thought that there were Iraqi terrorists on those planes? That misunderstanding was part of the left's disinformation campaign to get folks to be against the war. It doesn't matter how the dummies came to that understanding--whether Bush mislead or they succumbed to a disinformation campaign or whatever. They still thought it and it still influenced them in their support of the war. Nothing revisionist about that.

To: Sully- who wrote (35416)	3/18/2004 9:36:23 PM
From: KLP	Respond to of 793670

True! When 9/11 happened, Bush went to war on terrorism, not just against Al Qaeda. Bush included rogue regimes that harbored, sponsored or supported terrorism. That also is an irrefutable fact. Looking back at the SI threads from early on, both some on SI and the media they were quoting decided to just forget about 'rouge regimes that harbored, sponsored or supported terrorism'........ Most convenient memory lapse if you wanted to maintain Saddam in power... The anti-war folks must have just thought that Saddam would just implode eventually. Someday, off in the future. Maybe.