Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: smolejv@gmx.net who wrote (126584)	3/19/2004 9:57:23 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 281500

Thanks. I have read Joffe occasionally in American publications, and he is always level- headed and insightful.

To: smolejv@gmx.net who wrote (126584)	3/19/2004 12:51:27 PM
From: boris_a	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Dolinar: I changed my mind and I agree I don't. If you play chess, you know Steinitz: you cannot attack out of an unstable position without enough defensive resources. That's what Aznar did. The "success" of the terrorist is s***, but the one to blame is Aznar, not the people. With all the stories, he was unelectable anymore. But anyway, among your articles I found: "A pipe smoker with a 357 Magnum" textnart.de It was posted here, but a re-read is not inappropriate given the latest developments. I believe that the French really do a highly unspectacular, but very effective work against the terrorist. No impressive TV pictures, downplaying the fight, as less as media platform (for terrorism!) as possible but a high energy fight. The least thing we need in this fight are embedded journalists. Or corollary: when we have embedded journalists and a lot of TV pics, it cannot be an effective fight against terror. Whatever else it might be.