SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (35589)3/19/2004 10:59:22 AM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793858
 
epa mandates various cleaner gasoline. by area. if you are outside the area then you get a another gasoline mix. Now some states have gone and passed laws to adopt a gasoline blend that Ca. uses. Ma. and a few others.. this is a different mix than the epa foumular, the regular forumlar and i think costs about 10 or 15 cents more a gallon. Now in mid west you have blends with grain alcohol mandated by states to help farmers and uncle sam kicks in a 5 cents a gallon to help out. this is now another formular of gas.. and that's from the top of my head. Now try ship that down a pipeline and into storage tanks or barges, to a terminal that delivers to various blended areas. it is a mess and costly.



To: DMaA who wrote (35589)3/19/2004 11:07:30 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793858
 
My understanding is that localities with particular pollution problems (or particular economies, such as corn <g>) opted for certain in collaboration with the feds. For others it was mandated. I recall it as a negotiated process with states, industry, the feds, etc. A mixed bag of local option and federal prescription.

As with most things where there is a choice over whether to have choice, there is overhead and inefficiency either way. I had though that, in general, the country prefered the inefficiency of choice over the inefficiency of one size fits all.