SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond Duray who wrote (6753)3/19/2004 5:51:05 PM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Interesting theory on stell melting. For consideration purposes, I posted your reference in the thread header under 9/11 Investigation.

Questions: How much of the structural integrity did the planes take from the area of the buildings where they impacted? And what effect did this have on the floors above? I'd think losing the middle and resultant weight falling from above could have caused a pancaking effect. But my problem with this is that if such were the case, why wasn't there more of a tilting to the nature of the buildings collapsing? They did appear, mysteriously, to come straight down.



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (6753)3/19/2004 11:22:08 PM
From: Krowbar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Scroll down this page to see the diagram of a 757 compared to the small hole in the Pentagon. It just doesn't work. When is the deception going to stop?

the7thfire.com

Del