Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (8855)	3/19/2004 10:00:21 PM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

ABC News reviewing Iraq, this admin, in order to make a big splash and get SH and Chemical Ali managed to get them alive finally. That was only after they killed over 100 civilians because of lousy intelligence but accurate bombs. Huh? Bombs accurate except they're accurate on the wrong target. Anyone think those thugs in the admin lost any sleep over the deaths of 100+ civilians?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (8855)	3/19/2004 10:25:45 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Well, I disagree with all of course. But in particular, you are really fooling yourself about this: Ending the American occupation of Iraq, and establishing a UN coordinated peace keeping effort to relieve American troops and to defuse the terrorists there. First off, the UN is scared to even go near Iraq. The UN Iraq team's Iraq office is now in Cyprus. Second, if the UN were to get involved in Iraq, they would need the US to provide most of the armed force necessary. So the UN's involvement wouldn't relieve the US burden - it would mean the US would still carry the burden and take directions from the UN too.