SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT JOHN FORBES KERRY -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (993)3/21/2004 1:20:07 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 1017
 
Springtime for John Kerry

nytimes.com

Lead Editorial
The New York Times
Published: March 21, 2004

These days, everybody knows that a presidential campaign has to have a rapid-response machine. Rising above opposition attacks is so . . . Dukakis. And everybody also agrees that you have to start hitting hard early. In 1996, President Bill Clinton caught the Republicans off guard by saturating swing states with aggressive TV ads long before Bob Dole was ready to make a move. The next generation of political consultants learned a lesson, and now, viewers with the bad luck to live in swing states are being barraged with both attacks and counterattacks while the snow is still falling. There's something deeply disconcerting about greeting the first day of spring with a presidential race already in full bloom.

This year's conventional wisdom also holds that the next three months will be all about defining John Kerry. George W. Bush plans an all-out assault aimed at convincing the public that Mr. Kerry is a wishy-washy ditherer who is ill-equipped to be a wartime president. If that's what they think going into summer vacation, the White House believes, that's what they'll believe on Nov. 2. Mr. Bush, who was a kinder, gentler Republican in 2000, is opting for the meaner, tougher version this time around. It's very unusual for a sitting president to be on the attack so soon. He has every right to give this strategy a try, but he should remember that his strong suit with swing voters has always been his likability, not his policies.

Mr. Kerry had a good run through the primaries, a streak that seemed to peak on the golden day that his clever staff discovered Mr. Bush's pick for the symbolic post of czar for job-saving was a businessman who was building a new factory in China. More recently, things have gone off course for the Kerry campaign, which is under pressure to accomplish a set of contradictory tasks. It's not easy to set a positive, optimistic tone while simultaneously trying to convince the nation to fire George W. Bush for being a deceitful politician who doesn't care about average citizens.

We'd like to see Mr. Kerry veer more toward his own plans than Mr. Bush's failures. He needs to provide an alternate script to Mr. Bush's presidency — to explain very specifically what the Bush administration has done that he would do differently. And we'd like him to do it as forthrightly as possible. There was never any doubt that there would be compromises in a presidential campaign, but Mr. Kerry has seemed dishearteningly eager to embrace them. The public needs to see him make the hard choice at least once in a while.

Thanks to the ridiculously early schedule of primaries, it's certainly true that by the time Mr. Kerry is formally designated the Democratic nominee in July, he will be a very, very familiar face. In fact, by the time people get back from their August vacations, the fall campaign may seem like an entirely different event — a rematch between old rivals who have been carping about each other since prep school.



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (993)5/1/2004 11:12:37 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1017
 
Why does kerry lie and talk of Republicans attacking his service record.

Kerry's Defense Vision Laid Out In 1984 Campaign Memo: Cut, Cut, Cut, Cancel, Cancel, Cancel

JOHN KERRY'S "OVERALL DEFENSE STRATEGY"

Kerry Proposed Cutting $54 Billion From FY 1985 Defense Budget As Part Of "Long-Range Proposal To Cut $200 Billion From The Defense Budget Over Four Years," And Called For Cancellation Of At Least 27 Weapons Systems And Reductions In 18 Other Systems. "[Kerry] recommended cancellation of 27 weapons systems including the B1 bomber, the cruise missile, MX missile, Trident submarine, Patriot air defense missile, F15 fighter plane, Sparrow missile, stealth bomber and Pershing II missile. He recommended reductions in 18 other systems including the joint tactical air system, the Bradley fighting vehicle, the M1 Abrams tank and the F16 fighter plane." (Chris Black, "Kerry Asks Cuts In Defense Outlay," The Boston Globe, 5/30/84)

But Kerry Was Open To Even More Cuts Than He Had Already Listed. "There is nothing cast in stone about this list … It is an effort to create a dialogue in this campaign. It may be that there could be additional cuts." ("Kerry Asks $54 Billion Cut In Reagan Defense Budget," Berkshire Eagle, 5/30/84)

In Fact, Kerry Expanded List To "Specific Cuts In Some 60 Categories" In Discussion With The Cape Codder Newspaper, Including: SSN-688 Los Angeles Class Nuclear Attack Submarine, Trident I Submarine, Trident I Missile, Trident II Submarine-Based Missile, Midgetman Missile, Pershing II Missile, DDG-51 Aegis air defense destroyer, and CG-47 Aegis air defense cruiser. ("John F. Kerry," 1984 State Primary Newspaper Supplement, The Cape Codder, 9/11/84)

According To His Foreign Policy Advisor, Kerry's Proposed Cuts Formed "Overall Defense Strategy." "Joining Kerry was Michael Nacht, chairman of Kerry's foreign policy task force and an instructor at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government, who said Kerry's proposal was 'unique' because it was an overall defense strategy, not just a pro or con statement about certain Reagan administration programs." ("Kerry Asks $54 Billion Cut In Reagan Defense Budget," Berkshire Eagle, 5/30/84)

IF KERRY HAD HAD HIS WAY IN 1984 … NO AEGIS DESTROYERS WOULD HAVE BEEN BUILT

Kerry Proposed Cancellation Of Aegis Destroyer In 1984. ("John Kerry On The Defense Budget," Campaign Position Paper, John Kerry For U.S. Senate, 1984; "John F. Kerry," 1984 State Primary Newspaper Supplement, The Cape Codder, 9/11/84)

In 1985, First Of 52 Arleigh Burke Destroyers Was Ordered. (Federation Of American Scientists Military Analysis Network Website, "DDG-51 Arleigh Burke-Class," fas.org, Accessed 3/20/04)

Aegis Destroyer "Intended To Replace Some 30 Ships Due For Retirement Around 1990." ("Congress Authorizes $219 Billion For Defense," CQ Almanac 1984, p. 41)

NO B-2 BOMBERS WOULD HAVE BEEN BUILT

Kerry Proposed Cancellation Of B-2 Bomber In 1984. (Brian C. Mooney, "Taking One Prize, Then A Bigger One," The Boston Globe, 6/19/03)

"The B-2 Development Program Was Initiated In 1981, And The Air Force Was Granted Approval In 1987 To Begin Procurement Of 132 Operational B-2 Aircraft …" (Federation Of American Scientists Military Analysis Network Website, "B-2 Spirit," fas.org, Accessed 4/26/04)

FEW PATRIOT MISSILE SYSTEMS WOULD HAVE BEEN BUILT,
AND NONE SENT TO FRONT LINES OF COLD WAR TO PROTECT U.S. ALLIES

September 16, 1980: Initial Production Of Patriot Missile System Approved In 1980. ("Production Of New Anti-Aircraft Missile Approved," The Associated Press, 9/16/80)

* October 1, 1980: "A limited production contract for PATRIOT was issued." (U.S. Army Redstone, Alabama Arsenal Website, "Patriot," redstone.army.mil, Accessed 4/26/04)
* December 1981: "The first PATRIOT missile was delivered." (U.S. Army Redstone, Alabama Arsenal Website, "Patriot," redstone.army.mil, Accessed 4/26/04)
* May 1982: "The Army's first PATRIOT missile battalion was activated." (U.S. Army Redstone, Alabama Arsenal Website, "Patriot," redstone.army.mil, Accessed 4/26/04)

In November 1983, Army Ordered 440 Patriot Missiles And 12 Launchers. "The Army on Tuesday [11/29/83] awarded Raytheon Co. a $238 million contract for production of 440 Patriot air defense missiles and 12 firing units." ("Raytheon Gets Contract," The Associated Press, 11/29/83)

For FY 1984 Budget, Reagan Administration Requested 525 Patriot Missiles. "Among the major items requested for fiscal 1984 … [f]or the Army, $1.2 billion for 525 Patriot air defense missiles …" ("New Reagan Budget Increases Defense Spending 14% But Freezes Most Other Domestic Program Funding," Facts On File World News Digest, 2/4/83)

Kerry Proposed Cancellation Of Patriot Air Defense System In 1984. ("John Kerry On The Defense Budget," Campaign Position Paper, John Kerry For U.S. Senate, 1984)

September 14, 1984: "PATRIOT completed Follow-on Evaluation (FOE) III ahead of schedule. The highly successful test program demonstrated the system's capability to meet its operational requirements with production hardware and operational troops." (U.S. Army Redstone, Alabama Arsenal Website, "Patriot," redstone.army.mil, Accessed 4/26/04)

ü October 1984: "The Army recommended deployment of PATRIOT to Europe." (U.S. Army Redstone, Alabama Arsenal Website, "Patriot," redstone.army.mil, Accessed 4/26/04)

HUNDREDS, INSTEAD OF THOUSANDS, OF TOMAHAWK CRUISE MISSILES WOULD HAVE BEEN PRODUCED

Tomahawk Missile First Deployed For Testing In 1983. (Federation Of American Scientists Military Analysis Network Website, "BGM-109 Tomahawk," fas.org, Accessed 3/28/04)

* In FY 1982 And FY 1983, Over 60 Missiles Ordered. "McDonnell Douglas is scheduled to build 10 Tomahawk missiles with Fiscal 1982 funding. Contract for 52 missiles was awarded to the company in Fiscal 1983." (Eugene Kozicharow, "Tomahawk Moves Toward Dual-Source Production," Aviation Week & Space Technology, 2/6/84)
* Kerry Called For 50% Reduction Of Tomahawk Missiles In 1984. ("John Kerry On The Defense Budget," Campaign Position Paper, John Kerry For U.S. Senate, 1984)
* FY 1985 Pentagon Budget Request Set Aside $589 Million To Purchase Tomahawks Missiles. (The Associated Press, 5/31/84)

At Time Of Kerry's Proposed Reduction, Navy Was Warned Of Munitions Shortage, Including Tomahawk And Other Missiles Kerry Opposed. "The chief of naval operations had ordered Navy planners to 'rebalance' their programs to make up for crucial shortages of missiles, torpedoes and other munitions, it was reported March 31 … [Adm. James D.] Watkins informed Navy planning officers that funds alloted to the service were 'still not sufficient to fully relieve all critical shortages.' … The admiral cited the Reagan administration's objective of building a 600-ship Navy. He asserted that the service's main priority was to fully arm all new ships as the Navy grew. To that end, Watkins suggested a rechanneling of allocations into the production of munitions, particularly the Sparrow and Phoenix air-to-air missiles, Tomahawk cruise missiles, torpedoes and mines." ("Navy Munitions Shortage Cited," Facts On File World News Digest, 5/4/84)

In Early 1990s, Just After Gulf War, "There Were Approximately 2,500 Tomahawks In Inventory." (Federation Of American Scientists Military Analysis Network Website, "BGM-109 Tomahawk," fas.org, Accessed 4/26/04)

FAR FEWER BRADLEY FIGHTING VEHICLES WOULD HAVE BEEN BUILT

Bradley Fighting Vehicle Initially Produced In 1981. (United Defense Website, "Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle," uniteddefense.com, Accessed 3/26/04)

* Twenty Bradleys Produced In Fourth Quarter Of 1981. (FMC Corporation, Press Release, 4/21/82)
* About 300 Bradleys Were Expected To Ship In 1982. (FMC Corporation, Press Release, 4/21/82)
* Reagan Administration Requested 600 Bradleys For FY 1984.(Richard Halloran, "5-Year Arms Plan Reaffirms Growth," The New York Times, 2/1/83)
* Kerry Proposed Reductions In Bradley Fighting Vehicle Fleet In 1984. (Chris Black, "Kerry Asks Cuts In Defense Outlay," The Boston Globe, 5/30/84)
* Reagan Administration Requested 655 Bradleys For FY 1985. ("$107.6 Billion In Budget Set For Military Orders," The New York Times, 2/2/84; Richard C. Gross, "Pentagon Agrees To $14 Billion Defense Cut," United Press International, 5/3/84)

Since 1981, Over 6,700 Bradleys Have Been Produced. "The Bradley Fighting Vehicle System is manufactured by United Defence Limited Partnership (UDLP) and includes the M2 Infantry Fighting Vehicle and the M3 Cavalry Fighting Vehicle. It is in service with the armies of the USA and Saudi Arabia. Since 1981, 6,720 vehicles of both types have been fielded." ("Bradley M2/M3 Tracked Armoured Fighting Vehicles, USA," Army Technology Website, army-technology.com, Accessed 4/26/04)

FAR FEWER F-16 FIGHTER JETS WOULD HAVE BEEN BUILT

* In 1975, General Dynamics Won Original $4.3 Billion Contract For 650 F-16s.("General Dynamics Renews Its Pentagon Romance," Business Week, 2/3/75)
* First F-16 Was Deployed In January 1979. (Federation Of American Scientists Military Analysis Network Website, "F-16 Fighting Falcon," fas.org, Accessed 3/28/04)
* In FY 1979, Funding Approved For At Least 120 F-16s. House version of Defense Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1979 included funds for 145 F-16s, However Senate appropriated funds for 120 F-16s. Cannot determine outcome in Conference Report. ("Defense Funds: $117.3 Billion," CQ Almanac 1978, p. 138, p. 142)
* Defense Appropriations For Fiscal Year 1981 Included Funds For 180 F-16s. ("Congress Votes Hefty Increases For Defense," CQ Almanac 1980, p. 190)
* Defense Appropriations For Fiscal Year 1982 Included Funds For 120 F-16s.("Reagan Defense Plan Given Final Approval," CQ Almanac 1981, p. 328)
* Defense Appropriations For Fiscal Year 1984 Included Funds For 144 F-16s.("Funds Voted For Reagan Defense Buildup," CQ Almanac 1983, p. 488)
* Kerry Proposed Reductions In F-16 Fleet In 1984. (Chris Black, "Kerry Asks Cuts In Defense Outlay," The Boston Globe, 5/30/84)
* Defense Appropriations For Fiscal Year 1985 Included Funds For 150 F-16s.("For Defense, $274.4 Billion In Fiscal 1985," CQ Almanac 1984, p. 403)

FEWER THAN TWENTY APACHE HELICOPTERS WOULD HAVE BEEN BUILT

First Apache Rolled Off Hughes' Assembly Line In September 1983 And By January 1984, Just Nine Production Models Were Completed. "The first Apache rolled off Hughes Helicopters' Arizona assembly line two months ahead of schedule on Sept. 30, 1983, just 18 months after ground was broken for the facility, the most advanced helicopter assembly plant in the world. Nine production Apaches are presently being completed at the Mesa complex." (Hughes Helicopters, Inc., "First Production Apache Helicopter Successfully Completes Inaugural Flight," Press Release, 1/9/84)

Kerry Proposed Cancellation Of Apache Helicopter In 1984. ("John Kerry On The Defense Budget," Campaign Position Paper, John Kerry For U.S. Senate, 1984)

gopteamleader.com