Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (35914)	3/21/2004 2:56:42 PM
From: John Carragher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793729

i think the bigger story is the four years of clinton adm and clarke. I have to assume he gave Clinton the direct advise that Al Q. was his biggest problem and he had to go after them right away. I am interesting in hearing about four years of clinton and Clarke and how aggressive they were in attacking Al Q. bush had new staff , had to get his people approved through congress. I expect they also fell down on chasing Al Q. but maybe Clarke lost some of prestige while in the Clinton adm. ? It will be interesting to see how this falls out.. I find it concerning that clinton adm was already putting out noise before the interview this week. Bush is to blame but i feel clinton got much more dirt on his hands and maybe Clarke.