Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scott Bergquist who wrote (16784)	3/21/2004 8:25:16 PM
From: Greg or e	Respond to of 28931

I can only guess why you would not believe but I think you have already demonstrated enough animosity to the truth to assume that to be your likely reaction. 'Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my father's house, for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.' "Abraham replied, 'They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.''No, father Abraham,' he said, 'but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.' "He said to him, 'If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.' "Luke 16: Someone has risen from the dead and you fall all over yourself to deny it. You would likely claim the arches to be the work of aliens, or that you were dreaming, or any of a thousand other excuses. BTW, The bible doesn't teach a flat earth or a heliocentric universe. You must have heard that from someone else because I doubt you've even read the bible. Have you? "And HOW do you know I have not seen a "primary source document?" I gathered that you had not from your previous answer. Have you? Which ones? How many ancient languages do you read? "The "actual evidence" you cite is =strictly= an opinion, or worse, 100% fabrication. Even today, "hearsay" is NOT "evidence"...How is it you "twist" everything everyone writes here?" You will have to be more specific since you just jumped into the conversation and started hurling accusations. Words like "always" and "everything" are just sweeping generalizations. If you have a specific example I will be glad to address it. Paul's letters are direct eyewitness testimony, not hearsay.