Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (40086)	3/21/2004 6:17:36 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 89467

LOL!! What nonsense....

To: stockman_scott who wrote (40086)	3/21/2004 6:50:42 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

Scott, I've totally written off Bob Woodward. I'm surprised you think a creep like him can redeem himself. Carl Bernstein, who didn't play the same brown-nose games that helped Woodward to rise through the ranks at the Post has recently been much more honest and forthright than Woodward, who seems to be part of the conspiracy to keep the public in the dark. Recall the infamous quote from his ex-boss, Katharine Graham who acidly remarked that 'there are things that the public should not be informed of, for their own good'. She is sort of an extension of the same mental illness that pervades the neo-con movement and their Straussian obsession with lying for political gain. *** While I maintain a healthy skepticism about the American Free Press, this article brings up some historical information that is salient to a discussion of whether Bob Woodward is capable of mounting an attack on a pro-Zionist like George Bush. The answer is...... not if Woodward is interested in maintaining employment at the Post. americanfreepress.net