SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (9396)3/21/2004 7:42:40 PM
From: zonkieRespond to of 81568
 
60 minutes is much more powerful than Hannity and Limbaugh put together. This is going to hurt junior.

This week will seem like right after the State of the Union speech or the Russert interview when they had to trot out all people available to counter bad press. You are going to be seeing a lot of junior's aides as guests on the news talk shows this week.



To: American Spirit who wrote (9396)3/21/2004 9:21:03 PM
From: stockman_scottRespond to of 81568
 
Kerry to Study Bush Aide's Critical Book
____________________

MIKE GLOVER

Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry said Sunday he has asked for copies of a new book in which a former White House counterterrorism coordinator accuses the Bush administration of manipulating America into war with Iraq with dangerous consequences.

Kerry, a critic of Bush's handling of the war, said he wants to study the charges by Richard A. Clarke.

"Several chapters are being FedExed out to me here," Kerry said before returning to the ski slopes of nearby Sun Valley. "I would like to read them before I make any comment at all. I have asked for them and they should be out here tomorrow."

In the book, Clarke writes that Bush and his Cabinet failed to recognize the al-Qaida threat before Sept. 11, 2001 because they were preoccupied with some of the same Cold War issues that had faced his father's administration

While Kerry was reserved in his comments, campaign aides have been raising the issue with journalists traveling with the presumptive Democratic nominee, leaving little doubt that Kerry eventually will speak on the issue.

...

mercurynews.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (9396)3/22/2004 4:49:00 PM
From: stockman_scottRespond to of 81568
 
President Bush has a very large campaign war chest that grows by the day, how exactly can John Kerry overcome this? And is the debate going to move back to domestic issues, or does national security now obscure everything else?

Terry Neal: Well, first of all, the Kerry campaign believes it can raise about $100 million. That will be far less than what Bush raises, but enough to keep him competitive. Republicans almost always out raise Democrats, so they're used to fighting from behind.
One important development to watch is the emergence of left-leaning "527" groups, such as the Media Fund, American Voter and America Coming Together, as well as Howard Dean's new organization. These groups are raising millions of dollars in unregulated soft-money and are vowing to keep pace (or at least keep close) with Bush campaign spending. People such as George Soros and insurance magnate Peter Lewis are pouring millions of dollars into some of the organizations, some of which are already running anti-Bush ads in key battleground states.
Now these groups by law can not coordinate with the Kerry campaign, but make no mistake, their goal is the defeat of Bush and the election of Kerry.
It's going to be fascinating to see how it all plays out.

washingtonpost.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (9396)3/22/2004 6:40:49 PM
From: RuffianRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
The Commie You Love.............LMAO>>>>>>

FBI Shadowed Kerry During Activist Era

Mon Mar 22, 7:55 AM ET



As a high-profile activist who crossed the country criticizing the Nixon administration's role in the Vietnam War, John F. Kerry was closely monitored by FBI (news - web sites) agents for more than a year, according to intelligence documents reviewed by The Times.



In 1971, in the months after the Navy veteran and decorated war hero argued before Congress against continued U.S. involvement in the conflict, the FBI stepped up its infiltration of Vietnam Veterans Against the War, the protest group Kerry helped direct, the files show.

The FBI documents indicate that wherever Kerry went, agents and informants were following — including appearances at VVAW-sponsored antiwar events in Washington; Kansas City, Mo.; Oklahoma City; and Urbana, Ill. The FBI recorded the content of his speeches and took photographs of him and fellow activists, and the dispatches were filed to FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover and President Nixon.

The files contain no information or suggestion that Kerry broke any laws. And a 1972 memorandum on the FBI's decision to end its surveillance of him said the agency had discovered "nothing whatsoever to link the subject with any violent activity."

Kerry, now the presumed Democratic presidential nominee, has long known he was a target of FBI surveillance, but only last week learned the extent of the scrutiny, he told The Times. The information was provided by Gerald Nicosia, a Bay Area author who obtained thousands of pages of FBI intelligence files and who gave copies of some documents to The Times.

The FBI files shed new light on an early chapter in Kerry's public life and are another example of the extent to which the U.S. intelligence apparatus monitored and investigated groups opposed to government policies during the Vietnam era, especially the Hoover-run FBI.

FBI harassment of some activists and leaders in the antiwar and civil rights movements — including the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. — was exposed after Hoover's death in 1972, and reforms were mandated in the bureau to prevent such abuses and restore public confidence.

The files reviewed by The Times on Kerry do not show that the FBI engaged in any illegal actions in its surveillance of him. But the documents also show the lengths the government went to investigate not only Kerry, but the VVAW and other antiwar groups.

Intelligence officials referred to the VVAW in their reports as the "New Left." "Due to abundant indications of subversive influence, we are actively investigating VVAW," read one FBI report from 1971.

The documents could become an important resource for historians because they show the extent of U.S. government surveillance directed against an individual who, three decades later, may become president.

They also suggest that Kerry's memories of some of his antiwar activities, including the date he left his position on the VVAW national steering committee, were inaccurate. Kerry has stated that he left the group in the summer of 1971, but the files show that he did not quit until the late fall of that year.

Kerry said he was troubled by the scope of the monitoring documented in the papers.

"I'm surprised by [the] extent of it," he said in an interview. "I'm offended by the intrusiveness of it. And I'm disturbed that it was all conducted absent of some showing of any legitimate probable cause. It's an offense to the Constitution. It's out of order."

Kerry told The Times that knowing the scope of the government surveillance against him had made him more conscious of selecting the right people to run intelligence agencies. If elected president, he said, he would appoint an attorney general "who knows how to enforce laws in a way that balances law enforcement with our tradition of civil liberties."

"Today's FBI isn't the FBI of J. Edgar Hoover. The FBI of today is on the front lines of the war on terror, and it's critical that they be effective," he said. "But the experience of having been spied on for the act of engaging in peaceful patriotic protest makes you respect the civil liberties and the Constitution even more."

Kerry said that in 1987, two years after assuming office as a senator from Massachusetts, he requested and received an FBI dossier on himself. He later told aides it was "boring," and mostly included news clippings. The senator was apparently unaware that a much larger file existed that included reports on his activities as a VVAW leader.

Kerry said he was disturbed by "this extensive component of spying" on him that wasn't in his file. "If I was the subject of individual surveillance and individual tape recordings, I'd have thought it would have been released to me," he said.



Fourteen boxes of FBI files standing 12 feet high have been sitting for five years at Nicosia's home in Corte Madera.

Many of the files include mention of Kerry, who became the VVAW's most widely recognized figure after he sought to make the case against the Vietnam War in testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in April 1971. His appearance was widely reported because of his stature as a veteran who had been awarded a Silver Star and three Purple Hearts. As a lieutenant, Kerry had commanded swift boats patrolling the sniper-filled rivers across the Mekong Delta.

"The Nixon people viewed antiwar protesters as anti-American subversives," said Douglas Brinkley, author of "Tour of Duty," a book that details Kerry's Vietnam-era exploits. "Because of his record as a war hero, they feared Kerry's influence with the public."

Many FBI reports on Kerry relied on informants who had infiltrated the VVAW. One report, filed after a gathering in Oklahoma City on Nov. 8, 1971, described how 22 veterans gathered to talk about "alleged war atrocities in which they participated in Vietnam."

The file added: "From four p.m. to five p.m., John Kerry (news - web sites), featured convention speaker and national spokesman for VVAW, spoke to one hundred to two hundred people, followed by brief question and answer period. Kerry spoke against the war and encouraged young people to vote for candidates who will end the war. He said VVAW members will continue to be active in activities to end the war, but indicated that VVAW members are against any type of violence."

Other former VVAW members recalled their suspicion that their telephones were being tapped and their concern that informants had infiltrated their ranks.

"Once, our national office in Washington called the phone company to say they couldn't pay the bill," said Bill Crandell, a writer who lives in Silver Spring, Md. "They were told, 'Don't worry, it's being paid.' "

Crandell said he and others assumed that intelligence agents made sure that the phone lines remained active, though the FBI files reviewed by The Times contain no mention of wiretapping.

Ann Barnes, who worked with the VVAW and who now lives in Milwaukee, said the protesters took the surveillance seriously. "Wherever you went, there'd be people taking your picture, writing down your license plate, doing what they did," she said. "At demonstrations, we'd spot the guys tailing us and say, 'Hey, there's our guys over there.' But we weren't really laughing."

Kerry also recalls the shadow of surveillance. "I wasn't doing anything that I was worried about," he said. "That was the nature of the FBI and the dialogue of the times…. People used to joke about it more than anything, but it was frustrating."

He added: "I remember coming out of a meeting and seeing one of their unmarked cruisers sitting there. Somebody had left a firearm on the seat, as a form of intimidation. In Washington, when I walked the streets … I knew there were surveillance cars. But never to the depth I know about now."

When Nicosia began researching his book "Home to War," a history of the Vietnam veterans movement, he sent a Freedom of Information request in 1988 to the FBI seeking its VVAW surveillance files.

Eleven years later, in 1999, he received 14 boxes of largely redacted files. But the release came too late for any significant inclusion in his look at the VVAW, which was founded in 1967 and drew 10,000 members nationwide.

He had not read the files before allowing The Times to view a portion of them last week. After a call from Nicosia, Kerry aides came to his home to collect the same 50 pages of documents copied by The Times.

The files show that Kerry and his activities within VVAW were a subject of FBI surveillance throughout the summer of 1971, during a time he had said he had already left the organization.

The documents include evidence that Kerry did not resign from the VVAW's national steering committee until November 1971, during four days of meetings in Kansas City. Several Vietnam-era histories — and Kerry himself — had said his resignation occurred at a VVAW gathering in St. Louis in July.

Previously, Kerry had denied being at the Kansas City gathering. But the FBI files, along with interviews with former VVAW members, indicate that he attended at least some portion of the meetings, using the occasion to resign his post as one of the group's national coordinators.

"I still have no memory of a Kansas City meeting.

"I have this stark memory of the humidity that day [I resigned from VVAW]…. I just remember forever a dark storm brewing, with these huge thunderhead clouds."

But his recollection was that he resigned at the St. Louis meeting. "And every reminder we have since then has put it there, including Nicosia's book," he said.

But the files include a "priority" memorandum dated Nov. 16, 1971 — the day after the VVAW's Kansas City meeting ended — from Hoover to Nixon and other high-ranking administration officials. Quoting a "confidential source," the report said Kerry was there and had resigned from the VVAW for personal reasons.

"It's just weird," Kerry said, when asked about the discrepancy. He attributed his previous assertions to a faulty memory.

For example, he said, "there was a day in where I gave two speeches in Norman, Okla. I remember the first speech. I don't remember the second. It's just the nature of memory."

Several VVAW members also distinctly remember Kerry's presence in Kansas City.

"I remember the Kansas City meeting like it was last week," said Barnes. She said Kerry read an emotional resignation letter while scores of VVAW members sat around long tables in a church classroom.

"He said he was going into public service, that he was going to run for office," said Barnes. "It was a short speech, but it was emotional. Everybody cheered."

Afterward, Barnes recalled, Kerry and others stepped outside the church for a break, only to see FBI agents taking pictures of them from across the street. Barnes recalled saying to Kerry: "You've been thinking about this a long time."

And Barnes recalled Kerry saying: "Yeah, since high school."

The files document other Kerry appearances in 1971.

One report from Oklahoma said, "The entire conference lacked coordination and appeared to be a platform for John Kerry, national leader of VVAW rather than for VVAW."

Another concluded that a speech he gave at George Washington University was "a clear indication that Kerry is an opportunist with personal political aspirations."

But the reports were not always accurate. In one, an informant reported that Kerry planned to accompany VVAW co-director Al Hubbard to Paris to meet with North Vietnamese representatives to negotiate a POW prisoner of war release.

But another FBI file and other historical accounts report that Kerry was critical of Hubbard for making the trip and for exaggerating aspects of his military record. "John Kerry again attempted to have Al Hubbard voted off the executive committee as Kerry stated he did not think Hubbard ever served in Vietnam or was ever in service," reported one Kansas City informant on the tension that existed between Kerry and Hubbard.

Kerry recalled his opposition to VVAW leaders meeting with North Vietnamese officials. "I thought that would be disastrous to the credibility of the organization," he said, "to the people we were trying to convince about the war."

Kerry soon left VVAW, which he thought had lost its focus.

"The group achieved a lot of good, but it eventually splintered and diversified into these various things," he said. "It started to broaden into this diverse tug of war."

On Friday, the Kerry campaign released pages from the senator's personal FBI file, including a May, 24, 1972, memorandum in which the agency decided to end its information- gathering on Kerry's activities.

"It should be noted that a review of the subject's file reveals nothing whatsoever to link subject with any violent type activity," the report said. "Thus, considering the subject's apparently legitimate involvement in politics, it is recommended that no further investigation be conducted regarding subject until such time as it is warranted."



To: American Spirit who wrote (9396)3/22/2004 7:58:16 PM
From: Glenn PetersenRespond to of 81568
 
Walter Cronkite wants John Kerry to come out of the closet:

denverpost.com

Article Published: Sunday, March 21, 2004

Dear Senator Kerry ...

By Walter Cronkite

Dear Sen. Kerry:

In the interests of your campaign and your party's desire to unseat George W. Bush, you have some explaining to do. During the primary campaign, your Democratic opponents accused you of flip-flopping on several important issues, such as your vote in favor of the Iraq War resolution.

Certainly your sensitivity to nuance, your ability to see shades of gray where George Bush sees only black and white, explains some of your difficulty. Shades of gray don't do well in political campaigns, where primary colors are the rule. And your long and distinguished service in the Senate has no doubt led to genuine changes in some positions. But the denial that you are a liberal is almost impossible to reconcile.

When the National Journal said your Senate record makes you one of the most liberal members of the Senate, you called that "a laughable characterization" and "the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen in my life." Wow! Liberals, who make up a substantial portion of the Democratic Party and a significant portion of the independent vote, are entitled to ask, "What gives?"

It isn't just the National Journal that has branded you as a liberal. So has the liberal lobbying group Americans for Democratic Action. Senator, check your own website. It says you are for rolling back tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, for tax credits to both save and create jobs, for real investment in our schools. You've voted, in the words of your own campaign, for "every major piece of civil rights legislation to come before Congress since 1985, as well as the Equal Rights Amendment." You count yourself (and are considered by others) a leader on environmental protection issues.

You are committed to saving Medicare and Social Security, and you are an internationalist in foreign policy.

What are you ashamed of? Are you afflicted with the Dukakis syndrome - that loss of nerve that has allowed conservatives both to define and to demonize liberalism for the past decade and more? You remember, of course, that it was during the 1988 presidential campaign that George Bush I attacked Democrat Michael Dukakis both for opposing the Vietnam War and for stating he was a card-carrying member of the American Civil Liberties Union. Both proved, Bush said, that Dukakis was a liberal. Dukakis responded to that as an attack on his patriotism. He defended neither liberalism nor the ACLU.

Dukakis might have responded by saying: "I am surprised, Mr. Bush, that you are not a member of the ACLU. We do not have to agree on all the positions that the ACLU may take on this issue or that, but we should applaud its effort to protect the rights of Americans, even those charged with heinous crimes." Dukakis might have defended liberalism as the legacy of FDR and Harry Truman and John F. Kennedy - none of whom were anything like 100 percent liberals but all of whom advanced the cause of a truly liberal democracy.

But by ducking the issue, Dukakis opened the way for the far right to make "L" for liberal a scarlet letter with which to brand all who oppose them. In the course of that 1988 exchange, Bush offered a telling observation, saying, in effect, that liberals don't like being called liberal. You seem to have reaffirmed that analysis.

If 1988 taught us anything, it is that a candidate who lacks the courage of his convictions cannot hope to convince the nation that he should be given its leadership. So, senator, some detailed explanations are in order if you hope to have any chance of defeating even a wounded George II in November. You cannot let the Bush league define you or the issues. You have to do that yourself. Take my advice and lay it all out, before it's too late.



To: American Spirit who wrote (9396)3/22/2004 9:38:50 PM
From: stockman_scottRespond to of 81568
 
White House Tries to Discredit Counterterrorism Coordinator

_________________________

Shoot the Messenger

by William Douglas

Published on Monday, March 22, 2004 by Knight-Ridder

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration defended its handling of terrorism issues Monday and attacked a former White House counterterrorism expert who says President Bush ignored the threat posed by al-Qaida before Sept. 11, 2001, and was obsessed with Iraq after the attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center.

Bush has made his handling of the war on terrorism the centerpiece of his re-election bid, and White House officials unleashed a campaign-style damage control effort Monday to portray former aide Richard Clarke as an ineffective, self-serving partisan who has ties to Democratic Sen. John Kerry's presidential campaign.

They also said the administration moved aggressively against terrorism from the time Bush took office, and denied that it was obsessed with Iraq.

Clarke, who has served under every administration since Ronald Reagan's, criticized Bush's leadership on terrorism in his new book, "Against All Enemies," and in an interview Sunday on CBS's "60 Minutes."

"I find it outrageous that the president is running for re-election on the grounds that he's done such great things about terrorism. He ignored it," Clarke said in the CBS interview Sunday. "He ignored terrorism for months, when maybe we could have done something to stop 9-11."

White House officials lined up Monday to fire back at Clarke. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice appeared on almost all the television networks, where she disparaged Clarke's work and questioned his effectiveness.

"He had been counterterrorism czar when the embassies (in Tanzania and Kenya) were bombed in 1998," Rice said on NBC's "Today." "He was the counterterrorism czar when the (USS) Cole was bombed in 2000. He was the counterterrorism czar for the entire period in which the al-Qaida plot was being hatched that ended up in Sept. 11, 2001."

A former White House official said Clarke had pressed Rice and others to take the steps against al-Qaida that they did. The former official refused to speak for attribution for fear of retribution against his employer and him.

Vice President Dick Cheney, appearing on conservative talk-show host Rush Limbaugh's nationally syndicated radio program, described Clarke as an uninformed underling.

"Well, he wasn't in the loop, frankly, on a lot of this stuff," Cheney said. "As I say, he was head of counterterrorism for several years there in the '90s, and I didn't notice that they had any great success dealing with the terrorist threat."

Clarke, however, was the top White House counterterrorism official until the end of September 2001.

White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan questioned Clarke's motives. He suggested that Clarke was bitter about not getting the Number Two position at the Homeland Security Department. McClellan indicated that Clarke's comments and the timing of his book had more to do with election politics than with his concern about terrorism.

"This is one and a half years after he left the administration. And now all of a sudden he's raising these grave concerns that he claims he had," McClellan said. "I think you have to look at some facts. One, he's bringing this up in the heat of a presidential campaign. He's written a book, and he certainly wants to go out there and promote that book. ... His best buddy is Rand Beers, who is the principal foreign-policy adviser to the Kerry campaign."

Beers, who served as White House counterterrorism coordinator before he resigned last March to join Kerry's campaign, acknowledged his friendship with Clarke but said it had nothing to do with Clarke's charges against the Bush White House.

Beers said he'd just finished reading the book. "I have tremendous respect for his veracity and judgment," he said. "There is nothing in the book that strikes me as out of place or incorrect."

Until his resignation 13 months ago, Clarke held senior positions under Presidents Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Clinton and the younger Bush. A former National Security Council colleague described Clarke as a policy hawk who pressed Clinton for retaliatory strikes against al-Qaida for the U.S. embassy bombings in Africa.

In his book, Clarke says Bush and others in the administration were fixated on Iraq after the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington. Clarke wrote that Bush pressed him in a "very intimidating way" in the White House Situation Room on Sept. 12, 2001, about whether Saddam Hussein had any role in the attacks.

"But Mr. President, al-Qaida did this," Clarke said he told Bush. "I know, I know, but ... see if Saddam was involved. Just look. I want to know any shred," Clarke recalls Bush replying. McClellan said Bush didn't recall the conversation and that there was no record of the president being in the Situation Room that day.

Clarke accuses Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld of plotting to bomb Iraq in the days after Sept. 11, though there was no evidence Iraq was involved in the attacks.

Clarke said Rice "looked skeptical" when he briefed her in early 2001 about al-Qaida threats. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz wondered aloud during an April 2001 meeting what all the fuss was about Osama bin Laden.

"I just don't understand why we are beginning by talking about this one man bin Laden," Clarke quotes Wolfowitz as saying. Later, Clarke writes, Wolfowitz told him: "You give bin Laden too much credit."

Ron Hutcheson, Jonathan S. Landay and James Kuhnhenn contributed to this story.

© Copyright 2004 Knight-Ridder



To: American Spirit who wrote (9396)3/23/2004 9:58:44 AM
From: stockman_scottRespond to of 81568
 
The TV Ad Kerry Won't Broadcast

lewrockwell.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (9396)3/27/2004 5:16:54 PM
From: Lizzie TudorRespond to of 81568
 
this sounds good to me for the economic policy. Fiscal responsibility and deficit reduction, what a concept.

A Kerry Team, A Clinton Touch

THEY are a motley team, the four members of John Kerry's war room for economic policy.

Remember Roger C. Altman, the high-ranking Treasury official in the early Clinton years, forced out for being too loyal to his boss in the Whitewater investigation? He is one of them. Gene Sperling, a White House insider in all eight Clinton years, is another. Then there are two less-known 30-somethings: Jason Furman, a Harvard-trained economist, hired so recently that he is still working out of his Greenwich Village apartment, and Sarah Bianchi, who was Al Gore's policy adviser in 2000 and is now Mr. Kerry's. Both got their start in the Clinton White House, as young aides barely out of college.

The four are rapidly developing specific proposals to flesh out Mr. Kerry's still-general thrusts into economics. They are also constructing a galaxy of advisers - one that stretches from Wall Street to the A.F.L.-C.I.O. - who vet the proposals and often contribute to them.

The war room's handiwork is evident in Mr. Kerry's first big economic plank: his pledge in a speech on Friday to no longer allow American companies to defer income tax payments on profits earned abroad. The goal is to eliminate an incentive to send jobs overseas.

What is striking about the candidate's economics team is that all of its members - not to mention nearly every adviser they are reaching out to - served the Clinton administration in one way or another. Does that mean Kerry economics will be Clinton redux?

Ask the four team members that question and they hesitate. The challenges are different, they say. Job creation is a much more crucial issue than it was in Clinton's day, particularly the big decline in manufacturing jobs during the Bush years and the growing tendency to send sophisticated work abroad.

"Differing economic circumstances rightly bring out different priorities," Mr. Sperling said.

Even so, the fixes that Mr. Kerry and his core economic advisers are beginning to offer are clearly rooted in Clinton economics, which is resolutely centrist. Fiscal responsibility and deficit reduction, hallmarks of the Clinton years, are bedrock orthodoxy in the Kerry camp, too.

nytimes.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (9396)3/30/2004 12:11:18 AM
From: stockman_scottRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
USA Today claims Bush has been successful buying Ads that are creatively deceiving the public...his support is up (hard to believe)...

usatoday.com

IMO, it's time for the multi-billionaire George Soros to get his wallet out and prepare to write a massive check to totally even the financial playing field...Soros claims defeating Bush is his main priority in 2004 -- well, it's going to take a good candidate, a smart strategy and LOTS of money...Kerry has to define himself before the Bushies do it for him...Soros's PACs should nail GW Bush for lying and recklessly leading this country - before and after 9/11 (issue Ads should be running on HEAVY ROTATION in all major markets)...JMO.