SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (35968)3/21/2004 9:28:04 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793708
 
Another "Foreign Leader" comes out for Kerry.

Saturday March 20, 2004
The Guardian

Noam Chomsky, the political theorist and leftwing guru, yesterday gave his reluctant endorsement to the Democratic party's presidential contender, John Kerry, calling him "Bush-lite", but a "fraction" better than his rival.
Professor Chomsky - a linguist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology as well as a renowned chronicler of American foreign policy - said there were "small differences" between Senator Kerry and the Republican president. But, in an interview on the Guardian's politics website, he added that those small differences "can translate into large outcomes".

He describes the choice facing US voters in November as "the choice between two factions of the business party". But the Bush administration was so "cruel and savage", it was important to replace it.

He said: "Kerry is sometimes described as 'Bush-lite', which is not inaccurate. But despite the limited differences both domestically and internationally, there are differences. In a system of immense power, small differences can translate into large outcomes."

He reserved his especial venom for the Bush administration's plans for the health sector: "The people around Bush are deeply committed to dismantling the achievements of popular struggle through the past century no matter what the cost to the general population."



To: LindyBill who wrote (35968)3/21/2004 11:28:51 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 793708
 
Clarke's message is the classic double-edged sword for the Democrats. The older I get, the less I like trying to grab hold of a double-edged sword. It's hard enough to predict how a single-edged sword is going to work in real life.

Pointing the finger at Bush can only work if it doesn't point the finger at the Clintons, and I don't see how that's possible.

Maybe Kerry comes out smelling like a rose no matter what, in which case, I guess it's worth it for him.



To: LindyBill who wrote (35968)3/22/2004 12:04:06 AM
From: KLP  Respond to of 793708
 
Clarke's book should raise questions: If his charges against this President are to be taken as credible, and not partisan, then we need to know where that voice was for the previous eight years.

I read an earlier report on AOL (from AP) tonight that the Bush White House was following the Clinton terrorist "plan" until they had developed one of their own.