SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: blue red who wrote (126911)3/22/2004 8:44:24 AM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 281500
 
Mohammed Atta in Prague FAQ

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Home > 9/11 > Mohammed Atta in Prague

By Richard M. Smith of www.ComputerBytesMan.com
Updated June 19, 2002 (Original version June 16, 2002)

Introduction
The Czech government claims it has evidence that on April 8, 2001, Mohammed Atta, the ring-leader of the 9/11 hijackers, met in Prague with Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani, an Iraqi government official. Mr. Al-Ani worked in the Iraqi embassy in Prague. This meeting is controversial because the Czech and U.S. governments now disagree if this meeting ever occured or not. This FAQ attempts to look at all sides of this complex issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Mohammed Atta's alleged visit in the Spring of 2001 to Prague considered so important?

If this meeting did occur, then it would be a strong indication of possible Iraqi government involvment in the 9/11 attacks, especially considering that Mohammed Atta would have had to make a special trip from the United States to Prague to attend this meeting. [1] This meeting would have also been Mohammed Atta's second visit to Prague in less than a year. [13]

Why is the meeting between Mohammed Atta and Mr. Al-Ani in dispute?

The meeting is in dispute because the CIA and FBI do not believe that Mohammed Atta ever left the United States during April 2001. [8]

What evidence does the Czech Government have that Mohammed Atta was in Prague on April 8, 2001?

The Czech government is unwilling to release any details about the information that they have about the disputed meeting other then to say Mr. Al-Ani was being observed by the BIS, the Czech intelligence service, because he was suspected of being a spy. The Czech government position has been made public by Hynek Kmonicek, a former deputy foreign minister, and interior minister Stanislav Gross. [1]

What evidence does the U.S. government have that Mohammed Atta was in the United States on April 8, 2001?

The US governement has no record of Mohammed Atta leaving and re-entering the US in April 2001. They also were unable to locate a plane ticket that would have been used Mr. Atta to fly between the US and the Czech Republic. Finally, the U.S. Government has tracked Mr. Atta's movements before 9/11 via phone records, cellphone bills, and credit card receipts as part of the investigation of the 9/11 attacks. [8] [3]

How closely have the Czech and U.S. governments worked on the investigation of the disputed meeting?

Presumably the BIS, CIA, and FBI have shared data on the April 8th meeting and Mohammed Atta's travels during the month of April.

Has The US government officially stated its position publically on the disputed Prague meeting?

No. The U.S. position has only been "leaked" to major media outlets (Newsweek, Washington Post, New York Times, etc.) by an unnamed source. Presumably this unnamed source is someone from the CIA. However, Donald Rumsfeld, the U.S. Secetary of Defense, more or less confirmed these leaks when he said he was no longer sure if Mohammed Atta ever met with Mr. Al-Ani or not when asked by Robert Novak, a Chicago Sun-Times columnist in May 2002. [2]

Why has the dispute Prague meeting become such a political hot potato?

Various "Iraqi hawks" in the United States want to use the meeting as a pretext for attacking Iraq as part of President Bush's war against terrorism. Some well-known "Iraqi Hawks" include Paul Wolfowitz (Deputy Secretary of Defense), William Safire (columnist for the New York Times), James Woolsey (former CIA director), and Laurie Mylroie (journalist).

Skeptics of the Prague meeting point out that the evidence is skimpy at best that Iraq was involved in the 9/11 attacks. [2] [3] [8]

How can the controversy over the Prague meeting be clearly up?

The simplest solution is for both the Czech and U.S. governments come forward with the information that have about the Prague meeting and where Mohammed Atta was during the month of April 2001. For various security and political reasons, neither country is willing to take this step at the present time. Because of possible future military actions against Iraq, the U.S. government in particular wants to keep its options open. [17] On the other side, the Czech government seems reluctant to reveal its surveillance methods which can then be scrutinitized by indepedent investigators as well as foes. [19] Of course, new evidence can be developed by either country which can also end the dispute.

If the meeting really did occur, what did Mohammed Atta and Mr. Al-Ani talked about?

No one except for Mr. Al-Ani knows for sure. The BIS apparently was not able to listen in on the meeting. [19]

What are some of the rumors that have been reported about Mohammed Atta's Meeting with Mr. Al-Ani?

Mr. Al-Ani is a high-level spymaster. [15]
The meeting was part of the planning process for the 9/11 attacks.
Mohammed Atta recevied money from Iraq to carry out the 9/11 attacks.
Mr. Al-Ani gave a vial of anthrax to Mohammed Atta which was used in the anthrax attacks of the fall 2001. [16]
Mohammed Atta was helping Mr. Al-Ani to disrupt Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty transmitters located in Prague. [12]

Why was Mr. Al-Ani expelled from the Czech Republic in April 2001?

The Czech government expelled Mr. Al-Ani from the Czech Republic on April 22, 2001 because he was "engaging in activities beyond his diplomatic duties". This is diplomatic speak for "spying." The Czech government in particular was concerned that Mr. Al-Ani was involved in a plot to disrupt the operations of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty transmitters in Prague which now regularly broadcast to Iraq. [14]

Was Mr. Al-Ani is expulsion related to his meeting with Mohammed Atta?

The Czech government says no. [15]

What was Mr. Al-Ani is role at the Iraqi embassy in Prague?

Mr. Al-Ani was a consul at the Iraqi embassy. His job seemed to be arranging business deals between European and Iraqi companies. He was also known to harass Iraqi citizens living in the Czech Republic to return to Iraq. [7] Given his explusion by the Czech Republic by the Czech government, Mr. Al-Ani job also likely involved spying.

Has the Czech government ever changed its story about the disputed meeting?

Yes. The Czech Prime Minister Milos Zeman told CNN in October, 2001 that the Mohammed Atta and Mr. Al-Ani were planning to destroy the headquarters of U.S.-funded Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty which now broadcasts to Iraq. [12]

Has the U.S. government ever changed its story about the disputed meeting?

Yes. During the fall of 2001, U.S. government officials supported the Czech government view that the Prague meeting had taken place. They even indicated that Mohammed Atta had left the U.S. right before April 8th and return to the U.S. right after April 8th. [14]

When did the Czech government alert the US government about their information about the Mohammed Atta's meeting with Mr. Al-Ani?

According to press reports, not until after the 9/11 attacks when someone at the BIS recognized either Mohammed Atta's name or picture. [11]

Why didn't the Czech government alert the US government about the meeting in the April 2001?

Before 9/11, the Czech government did not consider the meeting important enough to notify the U.S. government. [11]

What has Iraq said about the alleged meeting between Mohammed Atta and Mr. Al-Ani in April 2001?

The Iraqi government said that the meeting never occurred. [18]

Where is Mr. Al-Ani today?

The Prague Post reported that Mr. Al-Ani now works for the Foreign Ministry in Baghdad. [7]

Did Mohammed Atta ever make any other visits to Prague?

Yes. Before coming to the United States in June 2000, he spent approximately 24 hours in Prague. He travel to Prague by bus from Hamburg, Germany where he was a college student. From Prague he flew to Newark, New Jersey. This trip has been well documented. [13]

What did Mohammed Atta do on his June 2000 visit in Prague?

No one has any idea. Even the Czech government says they don't know what Mohammed Atta did on the his June 2000 trip. Some people have speculated that he could have met with Iraqi government officials, but no evidence has been provided for such a meeting. This trip to Prague does look suspicous because Mohammed Atta seemed to a make big effort to go to Prague before coming to the U.S. for the first time. [13]

Did any other meetings occur between the 9/11 hijackers and members of the Iraqi government?

No other meetings have been publically reported.

Did any of the 9/11 hijackers make any overseas trips between when they arrived in the United States and the 9/11 attacks?

Yes, the following trips have been documented by U.S. government investigators: [20] [21]

Mohammed Atta 1/4/2001 Madrid, Spain
Mohammed Atta 7/7/2001 Zurich, Switzerland
Alshehhi 1/11/2001 Casablanca, Morocco
Alshehhi 4/18/2001 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Ziad Jarrah 7/25/2001 Germany

Links
[1] UN envoy confirms terrorist meeting
Prague Post, June 5, 2002
praguepost.com

[2] On Atta, Prague and Iraq
Chicago Sun-Times, May 13, 2002
suntimes.com

[3] The Phantom Link to Iraq
Newsweek, April 28, 2002
msnbc.com

[4] Atta, Prague, Iraq
Edward Jay Epstein, May 9, 2002
edwardjayepstein.com

[5] Mr. Atta Goes to Prague
New York Times, May 9, 2002
nytimes.com

[6] Protecting Saddam
New York Times, March 18, 2002
nci.org

[7] Iraqi leads opposition movement from Prague
Prague Post, April 3, 2002
praguepost.com

[8] No Link Between Hijacker, Iraq Found, U.S. Says
Washington Post, May 1, 2002
washingtonpost.com

[9] New Clue Fails to Explain Iraq Role in Sept. 11 Attack
New York Times, December 16, 2001
nytimes.com

[10] Czech PM: Atta considered Prague attack
CNN, November 9, 2001
cnn.com

[11] Czech government didn't tell U.S. about hijacker's Iraqi connection until after attacks
AP, October 28, 2001

[12] Czech PM: Atta considered Prague attack
CNN, November 9, 2001
cnn.com

[13] No Evidence Suspect Met Iraqi in Prague
New York Times, October 20, 2001
nytimes.com

[14] Czechs Confirm Iraqi Agent Met With Terror Ringleader
New York Times, October 27, 2001
nytimes.com

[15] New Clue Fails to Explain Iraq Role in Sept. 11 Attack
New York Times, December 16, 2001
nytimes.com

[16] Hijacker 'Given Anthrax Flask by Iraqi Agent'
The Times of London, October 27, 2001

[17] How Bush Decided That Hussein Must Be Ousted From Atop Iraq
Wall Street Journal, June 14, 2002
online.wsj.com

[18] Gunning for Saddam; Interview with Mohammed Aldouri
Frontline, November 8, 2001
pbs.org

[19] Czechs: Hijacker met with Iraqi spy
Prague Post, May 8, 2002
praguepost.com

[20] The Immigration and Naturalization Service's Contacts With Two September 11 Terrorists
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, May 20, 2002
usdoj.gov

[21] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -v- ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI
fbi.gov

computerbytesman.com



To: blue red who wrote (126911)3/22/2004 8:47:00 AM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 281500
 
This is from Slate:

Prague Revisited
The evidence of an Iraq/al-Qaida connection hasn't gone away.
By Edward Jay Epstein
Updated Wednesday, Nov. 19, 2003, at 9:58 AM PT


Partners in crime?

This month, I went to Prague to meet with Czech officials who had directly handled the pre-9/11 expulsion of a senior Iraqi diplomat, a case that would became known as the Prague Connection. Because it goes to the heart of the issue of whether Saddam Hussein might have played a role in the attack on the World Trade Center, this controversy has continued to rage, without any satisfying conclusion, for more than two years.

The background: On April 21, 2001, the CIA's liaison officer at the U.S. Embassy in Prague was briefed by the Czech counterintelligence service (known by its Czech acronym, BIS) about an extraordinary development in a spy case that concerned both the United States and the Czech Republic. The subject of the briefing was Ahmad Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani, the consul at Iraq's embassy in Prague.

The reason there had been joint Czech-American interest in the case traced back to the December 1998 when al-Ani's predecessor at the Iraq Embassy, Jabir Salim, defected from his post. In his debriefings, Salim said that he had been supplied with $150,000 by Baghdad to prepare a car-bombing of an American target, the Prague headquarters of Radio Free Europe. (This bombing never took place because Salim could not recruit a bomber.)

Continue Article

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So when al-Ani replaced Salim at the Iraq Embassy in Prague in 1999, both the United States and the Czech Republic wanted him closely watched in case he had a similar assignment. The BIS handled the surveillance through its own full-time teams and its network of part-time "watchers" at hotels, restaurants, and other likely locations. Then, on April 8, 2001, a BIS watcher saw al-Ani meeting in a restaurant outside Prague with an Arab man in his 20s. This set off alarm bells because a BIS informant in the Arab community had provided information indicating that the person with whom al-Ani was meeting was a visiting "student" from Hamburg—and one who was potentially dangerous.

On my trip, I spoke to Jan Kavan, who in 2001 was foreign minister and coordinator of intelligence. According to Kavan—who to my knowledge has not spoken publicly about this episode before—al-Ani had previously been spotted taking photos of the headquarters of Radio Free Europe. In this context, the restaurant meeting suggested that al-Ani might be recruiting someone to resume the bombing plot. Adding to the tension, the BIS lost track of the "student." So Kavan decided to act: He ordered al-Ani out of the Czech Republic.

During the next 48 hours, as al-Ani prepared his hasty departure, the CIA liaison called both the BIS liaison and the Czech National Security Office for further details about the expulsion, which presumably he then passed on to the FBI and other relevant parties. Kavan's able deputy, Hynek Kmonicek, arranged for al-Ani to exit via Vienna, Austria. As far as Kavan was concerned, the al-Ani problem was, if not resolved, then in the hands of American intelligence

The issue re-emerged three days after the 9/11 attack when the CIA intelligence liaison was told by the BIS that the Hamburg "student" who had met with al-Ani on April 8 had been tentatively identified as the 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta. Since al-Ani was an officer of Saddam Hussein's intelligence (and diplomatic) service, this identification raised the possibility that Saddam might have had a hand in the 9/11 attack. It could also be potentially embarrassing, as Kavan pointed out, "if American intelligence had failed before 9/11 to adequately appreciate the significance of the April meeting."

Kavan, in the newly created position of coordinator for intelligence, was in the center of the ensuing "crisis," as he termed it. He gave the FBI full access to the Czech side of the investigation. Two Czech-speaking FBI agents were allowed not only to sit in on the high-level task force evaluating the intelligence but to examine source material. If Atta was at the meeting, he could not have used his own passport to enter the Czech Republic, so the BIS assumed he had used a false identity and began checking through visa records for suspicious visitors in April, examining grainy videotapes from cameras at airports, bus stations, and game arcades. As the investigation was still in an early stage, the FBI had been asked to keep the identification of Atta secret, but within a week, the Prague connection was leaked to the press—from Washington. On Sept. 18, 2001, the Associated Press reported, "A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the United States has received information from a foreign intelligence service that Mohamed Atta, a hijacker aboard one of the planes that slammed into the World Trade Center, met earlier this year in Europe with an Iraqi intelligence agent." CBS then reported that Atta had been seen with al-Ani.

In Washington, the FBI moved to quiet the Prague connection by telling journalists that it had car rentals and records that put Atta in Virginia Beach, Va., and Florida close to, if not during, the period when he was supposed to be in Prague. The New York Times, citing information provided by "federal law enforcement officials," reported that Atta was in Virginia Beach on April 2, 2001, and by April 11, "Atta was back in Florida, renting a car." Newsweek reported that, "the FBI pointed out Atta was traveling at the time [in early April 2001] between Florida and Virginia Beach, Va.," adding, "The bureau had his rental car and hotel receipts." And intelligence expert James Bamford, after quoting FBI Director Robert Mueller as saying that the FBI "ran down literally hundreds of thousands of leads and checked every record we could get our hands on," reported in USA Today, "The records revealed that Atta was in Virginia Beach during the time he supposedly met the Iraqi in Prague."

All these reports attributed to the FBI were, as it turns out, erroneous. There were no car rental records in Virginia, Florida, or anywhere else in April 2001 for Mohamed Atta, since he had not yet obtained his Florida license. His international license was at his father's home in Cairo, Egypt (where his roommate Marwan al-Shehhi picked it up in late April). Nor were there other records in the hands of the FBI that put Atta in the United States at the time. Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet testified to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in June 2002, "It is possible that Atta traveled under an unknown alias" to "meet with an Iraqi intelligence officer in Prague." Clearly, it was not beyond the capabilities of the 9/11 hijackers to use aliases.

But just because Atta could have been in Prague did not mean that he met al-Ani there on April 8, 2001. Eyewitness identification can often be mistaken. It was known, however, that Atta had business in Prague prior to the 9/11 attack. Kmonicek, the deputy foreign minister, had found a paper trail of passport records showing that Atta had applied for a visa to visit the Czech Republic on May 26, 2000 in Bonn, Germany. Atta must have had business there, since he could have transited through the Czech Republic on Czech Air without a visa.

Atta's business appeared to be extremely time sensitive and specific to May 30. When Atta learned in Hamburg that his Czech visa would not be ready until May 31, he nevertheless flew on May 30 to the Prague International Airport, where he would not be allowed to go beyond the transit lounge. Although a large part of this area is surveiled by cameras, he managed to spend all but a few minutes out of their range. After some six hours, he then caught a flight back to Hamburg. From this visaless round trip, Czech intelligence inferred that Atta had a meeting on May 30 that could not wait, even a day—and that whoever arranged it was probably familiar with the transit lounge's surveillance. Finally, the BIS determined that the Prague connection was not limited to a single appointment since Atta returned to Prague by bus on June 2 (now with visa BONN200005260024), and, after a brief wait in the bus station, disappeared for nearly 20 hours before catching a flight to the United States.

The Czechs reviewing these visits in retrospect further assumed that Atta's business in Prague was somehow related to his activities in the United States, given that large sums of laundered funds began to flow to the 9/11 conspiracy in June 2000, after Atta left Prague. Even more ominous, if the BIS's subsequent identification of Atta in Prague was accurate, then some part of the mechanism behind the activities of hijacker-terrorists may have been based in Prague at least until mid April 2001.

Czech intelligence services could not solve this puzzle without access to crucial information about Atta's movements in the United States, Germany, and other countries in which the plot unfolded, but it soon became clear that such cooperation would not be forthcoming. Even after al-Ani was taken prisoner by U.S. forces in Iraq in July 2003 and presumably questioned about Atta, no report was furnished to the Czech side of the investigation. "It was anything but a two-way street," a top Czech government official overseeing the case explained. "The FBI wanted complete control. The FBI agents provided us with nothing from their side of the investigation."

Without those missing pieces—including cell phone logs, credit card charges, and interrogation records in the FBI's possession—the jigsaw puzzle remains incomplete.

Edward Jay Epstein is the author of Dossier: The Secret History of Armand Hammer and other books about deception.

slate.msn.com



To: blue red who wrote (126911)3/22/2004 8:52:17 AM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 281500
 
All I meant by "boss" was ringleader of the attack team.



To: blue red who wrote (126911)3/22/2004 11:50:30 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
a few names & facts for you:

Abu Nidal
Abu Abbas
Salman Pak
$25,000 cash for each suicide bomber
Ansar al Islam

ring a bell? I don't think Saddam was part of 9/11. But he sure was supporting terrorism.