Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (36214)	3/23/2004 9:52:02 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793903

C2 dont these two sentences sort of contradict each other. mike "The assassination will raise Hamas' stock at the expense of the PA's. How that can be seen as a good thing is beyond me." "I'm having difficulty understanding why, given Hamas' stance, did Sharon's government not put the screws to it and instead has concentrated in suppressing the more flexible Palestinian organizations, particularly those in the WB? It seems to me that Hamas, being the more radical adn therefore more dangerous organization, would have been given priority. "

To: carranza2 who wrote (36214)	3/23/2004 11:26:20 AM
From: Elsewhere	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793903

The assassination will raise Hamas' stock The former Israeli ambassador to Germany, Avi Primor, has the same opinion. dradio.de

To: carranza2 who wrote (36214)	3/23/2004 12:56:12 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793903

Obviously, Israel thinks that things have gotten to the point where they don't care about Hamas' "stock", only its capability. If Hamas is already maxed out in its attempts to kill Jews, what exactly is there for Israelis to fear? More local support of Hamas? They've got that anyway because the PA is so corrupt. They've doubly got it if they look like effective and invulnerable killers of Israelis. As I have said, you cannot regard this one killing by itself; Israel is moving against Hamas in a way that it hasn't in the last three years. For all its warts, the PA is the only entity with which negotiations can take place Ah geez, haven't we seen this movie already? You cannot negotiate with the PA. You cannot do anything with the PA, because Arafat is as bad as Hamas and nobody else can get their hands on the money or the guns. And now the PA is disintegrating. No loss. Everybody is waiting for Arafat to die. I'm having difficulty understanding why, given Hamas' stance, did Sharon's government not put the screws to it and instead has concentrated in suppressing the more flexible Palestinian organizations, particularly those in the WB? It seems to me that Hamas, being the more radical adn therefore more dangerous organization, would have been given priority. Look at the Israeli casualty figures in 2002. They were coming from West Bank suicide bombers, about half of whom were Hamas and half were Fatah. That is why the Israeli invasions were to the West Bank, where they disrupted both organizations, and really cut Hamas's effectiveness by taking the fight to Nablus and Jenin. Now Hamas is an effective organization only in Gaza. True, the suicide bombing still goes on, but the number of attacks and Israeli casualties were down by about 50% in 2003 vs. 2002. Gaza was already behind a fence, which the bombers could not get through. Therefore the problem was more contained. The Ashdod suicide bombing was the first to come from Gaza, and it was alarming because Hamas has learned Al Qaeda's trick of sending terrorists by shipping container.