Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (127236)	3/23/2004 8:14:41 PM
From: Bilow	Respond to of 281500

Hi CobaltBlue; Re: "US involvement with Saddam begins with the Iran-Iraq War. In the beginning the US was officially neutral, but later tilted towards Iraq, but that it didn't last. The CIA didn't ship barrels of nerve gas to Iraq, nor did ATCC ship weaponized anthrax to Huda Salih Mahdi Ammash or Rihab Taha." I don't dispute any of this. I was merely calling attention to the fact that one should include the money loaned to Saddam as a part of US involvement with Saddam. You may now continue to argue about how many angels (or devils) can dance on the head of a pin with E. But leave me out of it. -- Carl