Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (9834)	3/24/2004 3:17:16 AM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Again you go off on a tangent. Saddam is a diversion from the war on terror. The target is Osama, Ayman, Mullah Omar, the Taliban. The issue is not Saddam or Musharraf. We set out to go after them in Afghanistan. Bush gave up half way and turned towards Iraq. Initially he said it was because of Saddam's WMDs. When he realized there were no WMDs then he came up with manufactured goals such as oppression of the masses. The question is why did Bush give up on Osama when he had them in hot pursuit. And why is he going after them now. Special forces were diverted to Baghdad from the mountains of Tora Bora. Why?