SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (185455)3/24/2004 1:16:56 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573892
 
You said Bush didn't imply urgency and danger for the US.

I said "he never said that the Iraqi weapons where going to be used to blow up American cities in the next few months. He didn't even say what many accuse him of, that an attack with these weapons was imminent."

In one speech that I posted to you, he said it several times.

ted



To: TimF who wrote (185455)3/24/2004 7:55:06 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573892
 
re: I do agree that Bush overstated the urgency of the possible threat from Iraq. My only point since the beginning was that Bush didn't say or even in any obvious way imply that there was an immediate threat of a WMD attack on the US if the US didn't invade Iraq.

To put a fine point on it, he tried to scare the sh-t out of people to justify his self satisfying war against the family nemesis.

John


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News